Neutrality and Theory of Law / edited by Jordi Ferrer Beltrán, José Juan Moreso, Diego M. Papayannis.
2013
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Items
Details
Title
Neutrality and Theory of Law / edited by Jordi Ferrer Beltrán, José Juan Moreso, Diego M. Papayannis.
Added Corporate Author
Edition
1st ed. 2013.
Imprint
Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer, 2013.
Description
XII, 273 p. online resource.
Series
Law and philosophy library. 2215-0315
Formatted Contents Note
Preface
The Province of Jurisprudence Underdetermined; Juan Carlos Bayón
Necessity, Importance, and the Nature of Law; Frederick Schauer
Ideals, Practices, and Concepts in Legal Theory; Brian Bix
Alexy Between Positivism and non-Positivism; Eugenio Bulygin
The Architecture of Jurisprudence ; Jules Coleman
Norms, Truth and Legal Statements; Jorge Rodríguez
Juristenrecht. Inventing Rights, Obligations, and Powers; Riccardo Guastini
The Demarcation Problem in Jurisprudence: A New Case for Skepticism; Brian Leiter
Normative Legal Positivism, Neutrality, and the Rule of Law; Bruno Celano
On the Neutrality of Charter Reasoning; Wilfrid Waluchow
Between Positivism and Non-Positivism? A Third Reply to Eugenio Bulygin; Robert Alexy
The Scientific Model of Jurisprudence; Dan Priel
Jurisprudential Methodology: Is Pure Interpretation Possible?; Kevin Walton. .
The Province of Jurisprudence Underdetermined; Juan Carlos Bayón
Necessity, Importance, and the Nature of Law; Frederick Schauer
Ideals, Practices, and Concepts in Legal Theory; Brian Bix
Alexy Between Positivism and non-Positivism; Eugenio Bulygin
The Architecture of Jurisprudence ; Jules Coleman
Norms, Truth and Legal Statements; Jorge Rodríguez
Juristenrecht. Inventing Rights, Obligations, and Powers; Riccardo Guastini
The Demarcation Problem in Jurisprudence: A New Case for Skepticism; Brian Leiter
Normative Legal Positivism, Neutrality, and the Rule of Law; Bruno Celano
On the Neutrality of Charter Reasoning; Wilfrid Waluchow
Between Positivism and Non-Positivism? A Third Reply to Eugenio Bulygin; Robert Alexy
The Scientific Model of Jurisprudence; Dan Priel
Jurisprudential Methodology: Is Pure Interpretation Possible?; Kevin Walton. .
Summary
This book brings together twelve of the most important legal philosophers in the Anglo-American and Civil Law traditions. The book is a collection of the papers these philosophers presented at the Conference on Neutrality and Theory of Law, held at the University of Girona, in May 2010. The central question that the conference and this collection seek to answer is: Can a theory of law be neutral? The book covers most of the main jurisprudential debates. It presents an overall discussion of the connection between law and morals, and the possibility of determining the content of law without appealing to any normative argument. It examines the type of project currently being held by jurisprudential scholarship. It studies the different approaches to theorizing about the nature or concept of law, the role of conceptual analysis and the essential features of law. Moreover, it sheds some light on what can be learned from studying the non-essential features of law. Finally, it analyzes the nature of legal statements and their truth values. This book takes the reader a step further to understanding law.
Location
www
In
Springer Nature eBook
Available in Other Form
Printed edition:
Printed edition:
Printed edition:
Printed edition:
Printed edition:
Linked Resources
Alternate Title
SpringerLink electronic monographs.
Language
English
ISBN
9789400760677
Record Appears in