Federal administrative adjudication outside the Administrative Procedure Act / Michael Asimov.
2019
Formats
Format | |
---|---|
BibTeX | |
MARCXML | |
TextMARC | |
MARC | |
DublinCore | |
EndNote | |
NLM | |
RefWorks | |
RIS |
Items
Details
Author
Title
Federal administrative adjudication outside the Administrative Procedure Act / Michael Asimov.
Added Corporate Author
Imprint
[Washington, D.C.] : Administrative Conference of the United States, 2019.
Description
1 online resource (247 pages)
Formatted Contents Note
Frontmatter
Table of Contents
Chairman's Foreword
About the author
Acknowledgments
Chapter 1: Introduction
A. Introduction to Administrative Adjudication
B. Sources of Procedural Protections in Agency Adjudication
C. Types A, B, and C Adjudication
D. The Administrative Conference of the United States
E. Formal and Informal Adjudication
F. Judicial Deference to Statutory Interpretation in Type B Adjudication
G. Definitions
H. Additional Research
I. Abbreviations
Chapter 2: Types A, B, and C Adjudication
A. The Border Between Type A and Type B Adjudication
B. The Border Between Type B and Type C Adjudication
C. Statistical Data on Important Type B Adjudication Schemes
Chapter 3: Procedural Protections
A. Procedural Due Process
B. Judicial Enforcement of Statutory Requirements of a "Hearing" or "Opportunity to Comment"
C. Procedural Protections under Section 555
D. Procedural Protections in Agency Licensing
Section 558
Chapter 4: Best Practices in Type B Adjudication
A. Best Practices and Caution
B. Procedural Legitimacy
C. Best Practices for Type B Adjudication
Chapter 5: Type C Adjudication
A. The World of Type C Adjudication
B. Best Practices for Type C Adjudication
Appendices
Appendix A: Type B Adjudication Schemes
Appendix B: ACUS Recommendation 2016-4, Evidentiary Hearings Not Required by the Administrative Procedure Act
Appendix C: ACUS Recommendation 2018-3, Electronic Case Management in Federal Administrative Adjudication
Appendix D: ACUS Recommendation 2016-6, Self-Represented Parties in Administrative Proceedings
Appendix E: ACUS Recommendation 2014-7, Best Practices for Using Video Teleconferencing for Hearings
Appendix F: ACUS Recommendation 86-3, Agencies' Use of Alternative Means of Dispute Resolution
Appendix G: ACUS Recommendation 86-2, Use of Federal Rules of Evidence in Federal Agency Adjudications
Appendix H: Recommendation 86-1, Non-lawyer Assistance and Representation
Appendix I: ACUS Recommendation 70-4, Discovery in Agency Adjudication.
Table of Contents
Chairman's Foreword
About the author
Acknowledgments
Chapter 1: Introduction
A. Introduction to Administrative Adjudication
B. Sources of Procedural Protections in Agency Adjudication
C. Types A, B, and C Adjudication
D. The Administrative Conference of the United States
E. Formal and Informal Adjudication
F. Judicial Deference to Statutory Interpretation in Type B Adjudication
G. Definitions
H. Additional Research
I. Abbreviations
Chapter 2: Types A, B, and C Adjudication
A. The Border Between Type A and Type B Adjudication
B. The Border Between Type B and Type C Adjudication
C. Statistical Data on Important Type B Adjudication Schemes
Chapter 3: Procedural Protections
A. Procedural Due Process
B. Judicial Enforcement of Statutory Requirements of a "Hearing" or "Opportunity to Comment"
C. Procedural Protections under Section 555
D. Procedural Protections in Agency Licensing
Section 558
Chapter 4: Best Practices in Type B Adjudication
A. Best Practices and Caution
B. Procedural Legitimacy
C. Best Practices for Type B Adjudication
Chapter 5: Type C Adjudication
A. The World of Type C Adjudication
B. Best Practices for Type C Adjudication
Appendices
Appendix A: Type B Adjudication Schemes
Appendix B: ACUS Recommendation 2016-4, Evidentiary Hearings Not Required by the Administrative Procedure Act
Appendix C: ACUS Recommendation 2018-3, Electronic Case Management in Federal Administrative Adjudication
Appendix D: ACUS Recommendation 2016-6, Self-Represented Parties in Administrative Proceedings
Appendix E: ACUS Recommendation 2014-7, Best Practices for Using Video Teleconferencing for Hearings
Appendix F: ACUS Recommendation 86-3, Agencies' Use of Alternative Means of Dispute Resolution
Appendix G: ACUS Recommendation 86-2, Use of Federal Rules of Evidence in Federal Agency Adjudications
Appendix H: Recommendation 86-1, Non-lawyer Assistance and Representation
Appendix I: ACUS Recommendation 70-4, Discovery in Agency Adjudication.
Bibliography, etc. Note
Includes bibliographical references.
Source of Description
Online resource; title from digital title page (viewed on September 17, 2019).
Linked Resources
Language
English
Record Appears in