Table of Contents
Introduction; Christian Dahlman and Eveline Feteris
Reasoning by Consequences: Applying Different Argumentation Structures to the Analysis of Consequentialist Reasoning in Judicial Decisions; Flavia Carbonell
On the Argumentum ad Absurdum Statutory Interpretation: its Uses and Normative Significance; Thomas Bustamante
Why precedent in law (and elsewhere) is not totally (or even substantially) about analogy; Frederick Schauer
Fallacies in Ad Hominem Arguments; Christian Dahlman, David Reidhav and Lena Wahlberg
The Rule of Law and the Ideal of a Critical Discussion; Harm Kloosterhuis
Strategic Maneuvering with the Argumentative Role of Legal Principles in the Case of the "Unworthy Spouse"; Eveline Feteris
Legal argumentation and the normativity of legal Norms; Carlos Bernal
Weighing and Balancing in the Light of Deliberation and Expression; Bruce Anderson
Construction or reconstruction? On the Function of Argumentation in the Law; Jaap Hage
The Argument from Psychological Typology for a Mild Separation between the Context of Discovery and the Context of Justification; Marko Novak
Constitutive Rules and Coherence in Legal Argumentation: The Case of Extensive and Restrictive Interpretation; Antonino Rotolo and Corrado Roversi
Is Balancing a Method of Rational Justification sui generis?; Jan Sieckmann
Arguing on Facts. Truth, Trials and Adversary Procedures.; Giovanni Tuzet
Index.