Groups, Rules and Legal Practice / by Rodrigo Eduardo Sánchez Brigido.
2010
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Items
Details
Title
Groups, Rules and Legal Practice / by Rodrigo Eduardo Sánchez Brigido.
Added Corporate Author
Edition
1st ed. 2010.
Imprint
Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer, 2010.
Description
XXVI, 190 p. online resource.
Series
Law and philosophy library. 1572-4395 ; 89.
Formatted Contents Note
Three Tests
Accounts Based on the Idea of a Social Rule (I): Hart's Account and the Coordinative-Convention Approach
Accounts Based on the Idea of a Social Rule (II): Raz's Account
Collective Intentional Activities: Shapiro's Model
Kutz on Collective Intentional Activities. Building an Alternative Model: Groups Which Act with No Normative Unity
The Activities of Groups with a Normative Unity of Type (I). Non-developed Instances of Legal Practice
Gilbert's Account of Collective Activities
On Agreements
The Activities of Groups with a Normative Unity of Type II. Other-Regarding, Developed Institutions. Developed Instances of the Judiciary
Developed Instances of Legal Practice. Meeting the Tests.
Accounts Based on the Idea of a Social Rule (I): Hart's Account and the Coordinative-Convention Approach
Accounts Based on the Idea of a Social Rule (II): Raz's Account
Collective Intentional Activities: Shapiro's Model
Kutz on Collective Intentional Activities. Building an Alternative Model: Groups Which Act with No Normative Unity
The Activities of Groups with a Normative Unity of Type (I). Non-developed Instances of Legal Practice
Gilbert's Account of Collective Activities
On Agreements
The Activities of Groups with a Normative Unity of Type II. Other-Regarding, Developed Institutions. Developed Instances of the Judiciary
Developed Instances of Legal Practice. Meeting the Tests.
Summary
Ever since Hart ́s The Concept of Law, legal philosophers agree that the practice of law-applying officials is a fundamental aspect of law. Yet there is a huge disagreement on the nature of this practice. Is it a conventional practice? Is it like the practice that takes place, more generally, when there is a social rule in a group? Does it share the nature of collective intentional action? The book explores the main responses to these questions, and claims that they fail on two main counts: current theories do not explain officials ́ beliefs that they are under a duty qua members of an institution, and they do not explain officials ́ disagreement about the content of these institutional duties. Based on a particular theory of collective action, the author elaborates then an account of certain institutions, and claims that the practice is an institutional practice of sorts. This would explain officials ́ beliefs in institutional duties, and officials ́ disagreement about those duties. The book should be of interest to legal philosophers, but also to those concerned with group and social action theories and, more generally, with the nature of institutions.
Location
www
In
Springer Nature eBook
Available in Other Form
Printed edition:
Printed edition:
Printed edition:
Printed edition:
Printed edition:
Linked Resources
Alternate Title
SpringerLink electronic monographs.
Language
English
ISBN
9789048187706
Record Appears in