Recusal : analysis of case law under 28 U.S.C. ss 455 & 144 / [Alan Hirsch and Kay Loveland].
2002
WESTLAW
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS | |
Uniform Title
WESTLAW (Information retrieval system)
Title
Recusal : analysis of case law under 28 U.S.C. ss 455 & 144 / [Alan Hirsch and Kay Loveland].
Added Corporate Author
Imprint
[Place of publication not identified] : [Federal Judicial Center], [2002]
Distributed
[St. Paul, Minnesota] : Thomson Reuters, [2010]
Description
1 online resource
Summary
Litigants often move for trial judges to recuse themselves on grounds of partiality or the appearance of partiality. Improper denial of motions seeking recusal may have serious consequences. First, it can deprive citizens of their right to a "neutral and detached judge." Second, it can diminish public trust in the judicial system, which requires confidence in the impartiality of judges. This monograph offers a synthesis and analysis of the case law under 28 U.S.C. ss 455 and 144 to assist judges in ruling on recusal. It identifies the core principles and recurring issues in the voluminous case law, and it examines how the courts of appeals have applied these principles. The monograph does not propose reforms or critique court decisions. Judges should, of course, review the applicable decisions in their own circuits, as cases may exist in addition to the representative cases discussed here.
Bibliography, etc. Note
Includes bibliographical references.
Source of Description
Description based on electronic file, viewed June 26, 2014.
Location
www
Available in Other Form
Original
Linked Resources
Alternate Title
West Practice Ready Premier Treatise
Call Number
WESTLAW
Language
English
Record Appears in