In-house lawyers' ethics : institutional logics, legal risk and the tournament of influence / Richard Moorhead, Steven Vaughan and Cristina Godinho.
2018
Formats
Format | |
---|---|
BibTeX | |
MARCXML | |
TextMARC | |
MARC | |
DublinCore | |
EndNote | |
NLM | |
RefWorks | |
RIS |
Items
Details
Author
Title
In-house lawyers' ethics : institutional logics, legal risk and the tournament of influence / Richard Moorhead, Steven Vaughan and Cristina Godinho.
Added Author
Imprint
Oxford, UK ; Portland, Oregon : Hart Publishing, 2018.
Description
1 online resource (viii, 248 pages)
Formatted Contents Note
Introduction
Methods
The in-house lawyer and their place in networks
The tournament of influence : saying "no" and the independent in-house lawyer
Competing logics : a look at risk
Ethics and legal risk management
Striking the balance: identity and orientation
Mapping the moral compass : orientations, infrastructure and ethical inclination
The ecologies of in-house ethicality.
Methods
The in-house lawyer and their place in networks
The tournament of influence : saying "no" and the independent in-house lawyer
Competing logics : a look at risk
Ethics and legal risk management
Striking the balance: identity and orientation
Mapping the moral compass : orientations, infrastructure and ethical inclination
The ecologies of in-house ethicality.
Summary
"This book provides an empirically grounded, in-depth investigation of the ethical dimensions to in-house practice and how legal risk is defined and managed by in-house lawyers and others. The growing significance and status of the role of General Counsel has been accompanied by growth in legal risk as a phenomenon of importance. In-house lawyers are regularly exhorted to be more commercial, proactive and strategic, to be business leaders and not (mere) lawyers, but they are increasingly exposed for their roles in organisational scandals. This book poses the question: how far does going beyond being a lawyer conflict with or entail being more ethical? It explores the role of in-housers by calling on three key pieces of empirical research: two tranches of interviews with senior in-house lawyers and senior compliance staff; and an unparalleled large survey of in-house lawyers. On the basis of this evidence, the authors explore how ideas about in-house roles shape professional logics; how far professional notions such as independence play a role in those logics; and the ways in which ethical infrastructure are managed or are absent from in-house practice. It concludes with a discussion of whether and how in-house lawyers and their regulators need to take professionalism and professional ethicality more seriously."--Bloomsbury Publishing.
Note
Includes index.
Available Note
Also issued in print.
Location
www
Available in Other Form
Original
Linked Resources
Alternate Title
Bloomsbury Collections
Language
English
Reproduction
Electronic reproduction. London : Bloomsbury Publishing, 2018. Available via World Wide Web. Access limited by licensing agreement.
ISBN
9781509905959 (online)
9781509905942 (hardback)
9781509905935 (electronic book)
9781509905928 (PDF)
9781509905942 (hardback)
9781509905935 (electronic book)
9781509905928 (PDF)
Record Appears in