Nijhoff international investment law series ; 7. International Law E-Books Online, Collection 2017, ISBN ; 9789004328044.
Investor-State arbitration is currently a much-debated topic, both within the legal community and in the public at large. In Towards Consistency in International Investment Jurisprudence , Katharina Diel-Gligor addresses the alleged proliferation of inconsistent decision-making in this field - one of the main points of concern raised in the ongoing discussions. After exploring whether such criticism is appropriate at all, she goes on to examine the different causes, forms, and manifestations of the inconsistencies that exist through a detailed analysis of ICSID arbitration. The author then canvasses possible approaches to reform and concludes that an ICSID preliminary ruling system - the practicalities of which are set out in the study - is a suitable means for enhancing consistency in investment arbitration and moving towards a jurisprudence constante .
Based on author's dissertation (doctoral - Universität Heidelberg. Juristische Fakultät, 2014).
Bibliography, etc. Note
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Formatted Contents Note
Introduction Contextual Framework and Object of Study Problem Analysis: Inconsistency in icsid Investment Jurisprudence Reform Proposal: Curing Inconsistent icsid Investment Jurisprudence Conclusion Summary in German Annex Table of Cases.
Available to subscribing member institutions only.
Digital File Characteristics
Source of Description
Description based on print version record and CIP data provided by publisher; resource not viewed.
Available in Other Form
Print version: Diel-Gligor, Katharina, author. Towards consistency in international investment jurisprudence Leiden ; Boston : Brill Nijhoff, 2017