Proportionality and deference in investor-state arbitration : balancing investment protection and regulatory autonomy / Caroline Henckels.
2015
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS | |
Title
Proportionality and deference in investor-state arbitration : balancing investment protection and regulatory autonomy / Caroline Henckels.
Imprint
Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2015.
Description
1 online resource (xxxii, 225 pages) : digital, PDF file(s).
Series
Cambridge studies in international and comparative law (Cambridge, England : 1996) ; 122.
Formatted Contents Note
Proportionality and deference in theoretical perspective
Operationalizing deference in the context of proportionality analysis : comparative approaches
Methods of review employed by investment tribunals in regulatory disputes
The development of an institutionally sensitive approach to proportionality analysis in investor-state arbitration
Other issues affecting the method and standard of review in investor-state arbitration.
Operationalizing deference in the context of proportionality analysis : comparative approaches
Methods of review employed by investment tribunals in regulatory disputes
The development of an institutionally sensitive approach to proportionality analysis in investor-state arbitration
Other issues affecting the method and standard of review in investor-state arbitration.
Summary
In this study, Caroline Henckels examines how investment tribunals have balanced the competing interests of host states and foreign investors in determining state liability in disputes concerning the exercise of public power. Analyzing the concepts of proportionality and deference in investment tribunals' decision-making in comparative perspective, the book proposes a new methodology for investment tribunals to adopt in regulatory disputes, which combines proportionality analysis with an institutionally sensitive approach to the standard of review. Henckels argues that adopting a modified form of proportionality analysis would provide a means for tribunals to decide cases in a more consistent and coherent manner leading to greater certainty for both states and investors, and that affording due deference to host states in the determination of liability would address the concern that the decisions of investment tribunals unjustifiably impact on the regulatory autonomy of states.
Note
Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
Location
www
Available in Other Form
Print version:
Linked Resources
Alternate Title
Cambridge Books Online.
Language
English
ISBN
9781316104378 (ebook)
9781107087903 (hardback)
9781107458178 (paperback)
9781107087903 (hardback)
9781107458178 (paperback)
Record Appears in