Critical debates on counter-terrorism judicial review / edited by Fergal F. Davis and Fiona de Londras.
2014
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS | |
Title
Critical debates on counter-terrorism judicial review / edited by Fergal F. Davis and Fiona de Londras.
Imprint
Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2014.
Description
1 online resource (ix, 376 pages) : digital, PDF file(s)
Formatted Contents Note
Introduction : Counter-terrorist judicial review : beyond dichotomies / Fergal F. Davis and Fiona de Londras
Part I. Counter-terrorist judicial review as regulatory constitutionalism / Fiona de Londras
Counter-terrorism judicial review by a traditionally weak judiciary / Jens Elo Rytter
When good cases go bad : unintended consequences of rights-friendly judgments / David Jenkins
The rhetoric and reality of judicial review of counter-terrorism actions : the United States experience / Jules Lobel
Part II. Beyond counter-terrorism judicial review
Emergency law as administrative law / Mark Tushnet
The politics of counter-terrorism judicial review : creating effective parliamentary scrutiny / Fergal F. Davis
Independent reviewers as alternative : an empirical study from Australia and the UK / Jessie Blackbourn.
Public inquiries as an attempt to fill accountability gaps left by judicial and legislative review / Kent Roach
Part III. Counter-terrorism judicial review in the political constitution
Rebalancing the unbalanced constitution : juridification and national security in the United Kingdom / Roger Masterman
Business as usual : deference in counter-terrorist judicial review / Cora Chan
Deference and dialogue in the real-world counter-terrorism context / Gavin Phillipson
Part IV. Internationalised counter-terrorism judicial review
Counter-terrorism law and judicial review : the challenge for the Court of Justice of the European Union / Cian C. Murphy
Post 9/11 UK counter-terrorism cases in the European Court of Human Rights : a 'dialogic' approach to rights protection or appeasement of national authorities? / Helen Fenwick
Accountability for counter-terrorism : challenges and potential in the role of the courts / Helen Duffy.
Part I. Counter-terrorist judicial review as regulatory constitutionalism / Fiona de Londras
Counter-terrorism judicial review by a traditionally weak judiciary / Jens Elo Rytter
When good cases go bad : unintended consequences of rights-friendly judgments / David Jenkins
The rhetoric and reality of judicial review of counter-terrorism actions : the United States experience / Jules Lobel
Part II. Beyond counter-terrorism judicial review
Emergency law as administrative law / Mark Tushnet
The politics of counter-terrorism judicial review : creating effective parliamentary scrutiny / Fergal F. Davis
Independent reviewers as alternative : an empirical study from Australia and the UK / Jessie Blackbourn.
Public inquiries as an attempt to fill accountability gaps left by judicial and legislative review / Kent Roach
Part III. Counter-terrorism judicial review in the political constitution
Rebalancing the unbalanced constitution : juridification and national security in the United Kingdom / Roger Masterman
Business as usual : deference in counter-terrorist judicial review / Cora Chan
Deference and dialogue in the real-world counter-terrorism context / Gavin Phillipson
Part IV. Internationalised counter-terrorism judicial review
Counter-terrorism law and judicial review : the challenge for the Court of Justice of the European Union / Cian C. Murphy
Post 9/11 UK counter-terrorism cases in the European Court of Human Rights : a 'dialogic' approach to rights protection or appeasement of national authorities? / Helen Fenwick
Accountability for counter-terrorism : challenges and potential in the role of the courts / Helen Duffy.
Summary
Is judicial review an effective and appropriate way to regulate counter-terrorism measures? Some argue that the judiciary is ill-equipped to examine such measures, for instance because they lack the expertise of the institutions which bring them about under exigent conditions. Others claim that subjecting counter-terrorism measures to judicial review is crucial for maintaining a jurisdiction's principles of constitutionalism. This volume brings together voices from all sides of the debate from a broad range of jurisdictions, from North America, Europe and Australasia. It does not attempt to 'resolve' the argument but rather to explore it in all its dimensions. The debates are essentially concerned with fundamental questions of organising and making accountable the exercise of power in a particularly challenging environment. The book is necessary reading for all those concerned with counter-terrorism, but also with broader public law, constitutional law and administrative law principles.
Note
Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
Location
www
Available in Other Form
Print version:
Linked Resources
Alternate Title
Cambridge Books Online.
Language
English
ISBN
9781107282124 (ebook)
9781107053618 (hardback)
9781107662964 (paperback)
9781107053618 (hardback)
9781107662964 (paperback)
Record Appears in