The human rights treaty obligations of peacekeepers / Kjetil Mujezinović Larsen.
2012
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Items
Details
Title
The human rights treaty obligations of peacekeepers / Kjetil Mujezinović Larsen.
Imprint
Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Description
1 online resource (xlii, 473 pages) : digital, PDF file(s).
Series
Cambridge studies in international and comparative law (Cambridge, England : 1996) ; 93.
Formatted Contents Note
Part I. Background and context
1. Introduction and overview
2. The context
Part II. Two fundamental arguments for non-applicability of human rights treaties
3. The argument of non-applicability ratione personae
4. The argument of non-applicability ratione loci
Part III. Circumstances that may exclude or modify the application of the treaties
5. The applicability of human rights law during armed conflicts
6. Derogations
7. Norm conflicts between UN Security Council mandates and human rights treaties
Part IV. Application in concretu : the right to life, to freedom from torture, and to liberty and security
8. Legal challenges relating to the interrelationship between troop contributing states
9. Selected issues relating to the application of substantive provisions
Part V. Conclusions
10. Conclusions.
1. Introduction and overview
2. The context
Part II. Two fundamental arguments for non-applicability of human rights treaties
3. The argument of non-applicability ratione personae
4. The argument of non-applicability ratione loci
Part III. Circumstances that may exclude or modify the application of the treaties
5. The applicability of human rights law during armed conflicts
6. Derogations
7. Norm conflicts between UN Security Council mandates and human rights treaties
Part IV. Application in concretu : the right to life, to freedom from torture, and to liberty and security
8. Legal challenges relating to the interrelationship between troop contributing states
9. Selected issues relating to the application of substantive provisions
Part V. Conclusions
10. Conclusions.
Summary
Do States, through their military forces, have legal obligations under human rights treaties towards the local civilian population during UN-mandated peace operations? It is frequently claimed that it is unrealistic to require compliance with human rights treaties in peace operations and this has led to an unwillingness to hold States accountable for human rights violations. In this book, Kjetil Larsen criticises this position by addressing the arguments against the applicability of human rights treaties and demonstrating that compliance with the treaties is unrealistic only if one takes an 'all or nothing' approach to them. He outlines a coherent and more flexible approach which distinguishes clearly between positive and negative obligations and makes treaty compliance more realistic. His proposals for the application of human rights treaties would also strengthen the legal framework for human rights protection in peace operations without posing any unrealistic obligations on the military forces.
Note
Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
Location
www
Available in Other Form
Print version:
Linked Resources
Alternate Title
Cambridge Books Online.
Language
English
ISBN
9781139062022 (ebook)
9781107017078 (hardback)
9781107416949 (paperback)
9781107017078 (hardback)
9781107416949 (paperback)
Record Appears in