Cover; Half Title; Title Page; Copyright Page; Table of Contents; Acknowledgements; Abbreviations; 1. Introduction; A Aim and approach; B Contribution to knowledge; C Book structure; 2. The network-based structure of transnational terrorist groups: an analysis of their effectiveness in perpetrating terrorist attacks; A Introduction; B The conceptualisation of the network-based terrorist group; C Modern organisational network theory and transnational terrorist groups; D Conclusion; 3. The classification of attacks by transnational terrorist groups as a crime under the Rome Statute

A IntroductionB Genocide; C War crimes; D Crimes against humanity; E Conclusion; 4. The evolution of an international crime of transnational terrorism; A Introduction; B The evolution of the legal concept of terrorism; C The emergence of a customary crime of transnational terrorism; D Sources of law relied upon by the STL Appeals Chamber to deduce a customary crime of transnational terrorism; E Classifying the customary crime of transnational terrorism as an international crime; F The constituent elements of the customary crime of transnational terrorism

G Challenges in prosecuting the customary crime of terrorism at the ICCH Conclusion; 5. Applying the doctrine of command responsibility under Article 28 of the Rome Statute: the dilemma of successor commanders; A Introduction; B The scope of application of the doctrine of command responsibility to attacks by transnational terrorist groups; C The command responsibility of leaders of transnational terrorist groups; D The criteria for establishing the accountability of leaders of transnational terrorist groups; E The duties of leaders of transnational terrorist groups under the Rome Statute

F The challenges in prosecuting leaders of transnational terrorist groups under the Rome StatuteG Conclusion; 6. Holding members of transnational terrorist groups accountable under Article 25 of the Rome Statute: effectiveness, legitimacy, and impact; A Introduction; B The principle of individual criminal responsibility under Article 25 of the Rome Statute; C The criteria for determining the accountability of members of transnational terrorist groups under Article 25; D The concept of indirect co-perpetration under Article 25 and its application to members of transnational terrorist groups

E Limitations of Article 25 of the Rome Statute in prosecutions of members of transnational terrorist groupsF Conclusion; 7. The accountability of transnational terrorist groups as a collectivity: quandaries for the jurisdiction of the ICC; A Introduction; B The transnational terrorist group and the dilemma of collective entity responsibility in international criminal law; C Attributing responsibility to collective entities and ethics theory: prospects for international criminal law