Coercion and the nature of law / Kenneth Einar Himma.
2020
K579.D8 H56 2020 (Mapit)
Available at Stacks
Formats
Format | |
---|---|
BibTeX | |
MARCXML | |
TextMARC | |
MARC | |
DublinCore | |
EndNote | |
NLM | |
RefWorks | |
RIS |
Items
Details
Title
Coercion and the nature of law / Kenneth Einar Himma.
Edition
First edition.
Imprint
Oxford, United Kingdom ; New York, NY : Oxford University Press, 2020.
Copyright
©2020
Description
xiii, 273 pages ; 24 cm.
Series
Oxford legal philosophy.
Formatted Contents Note
1. The coercion thesis
2. Methodology and the nature of law
3. A prima facie case for the coercion thesis: Sanctions as a paradigmatic feature of municipal law
4. What law must be able to do: The coercion thesis and the need to keep the peace
5. Three conceptual problems of legal normativity: the logical space of reasons
6. The coercion thesis and the how problem of legal normativity
7. The coercion thesis and the order problem of legal normativity
8. The coercion thesis and the content problem of legal normativity
9. Coercive sanctions and international law
10. Can there be law in a society of angels?
2. Methodology and the nature of law
3. A prima facie case for the coercion thesis: Sanctions as a paradigmatic feature of municipal law
4. What law must be able to do: The coercion thesis and the need to keep the peace
5. Three conceptual problems of legal normativity: the logical space of reasons
6. The coercion thesis and the how problem of legal normativity
7. The coercion thesis and the order problem of legal normativity
8. The coercion thesis and the content problem of legal normativity
9. Coercive sanctions and international law
10. Can there be law in a society of angels?
Summary
The Coercion Thesis has been a subject of longstanding debate, but legal positivist scholarship over the last several decades has concluded that coercion is not necessary for law. Coercion and the Nature of Law is concerned with reviving the Coercion Thesis, presenting a strong case for the inherently coercive nature of legal regulation, and arguing that anything properly characterized as a legal system must back legal norms prohibiting breaches of the peace with the threat of a coercive sanction. Himma presents the argument that people are self-interested beings who must compete in a world of scarcity for everything they need to survive and thrive. The need to compete for resources naturally leads to conflict that can breach the peace, and threatens the ability to live together in a community and reap the social benefits of cooperation. Law only functions as a system if it can maintain the peace enough for community to continue, and thus systems of law cannot succeed in doing anything that we want systems of law to do unless they back laws prohibiting violent assaults on persons or property with the threat of punishment; without sanctions, we would descend into something resembling a condition of war-of-all-against-all. We adopt coercive systems of regulation precisely to avoid having to live under such conditions. The book is divided into three parts: (1) a prima facie logical-empirical case for the Coercion Thesis, (2) a study of the "society of angels" and international law counterexamples, and why they do not refute the thesis, and (3) an analysis of how law guides behaviour and the implications of the Coercion Thesis on reasons for going against the current conventional wisdom in legal philosophy. Himma makes a systematic defence of the Coercion Thesis arguing that coercion or enforcement mechanisms are not only a necessary feature of legal systems, but a conceptually necessary feature of legal systems.
Note
The Coercion Thesis has been a subject of longstanding debate, but legal positivist scholarship over the last several decades has concluded that coercion is not necessary for law. Coercion and the Nature of Law is concerned with reviving the Coercion Thesis, presenting a strong case for the inherently coercive nature of legal regulation, and arguing that anything properly characterized as a legal system must back legal norms prohibiting breaches of the peace with the threat of a coercive sanction. Himma presents the argument that people are self-interested beings who must compete in a world of scarcity for everything they need to survive and thrive. The need to compete for resources naturally leads to conflict that can breach the peace, and threatens the ability to live together in a community and reap the social benefits of cooperation. Law only functions as a system if it can maintain the peace enough for community to continue, and thus systems of law cannot succeed in doing anything that we want systems of law to do unless they back laws prohibiting violent assaults on persons or property with the threat of punishment; without sanctions, we would descend into something resembling a condition of war-of-all-against-all. We adopt coercive systems of regulation precisely to avoid having to live under such conditions. The book is divided into three parts: (1) a prima facie logical-empirical case for the Coercion Thesis, (2) a study of the "society of angels" and international law counterexamples, and why they do not refute the thesis, and (3) an analysis of how law guides behaviour and the implications of the Coercion Thesis on reasons for going against the current conventional wisdom in legal philosophy. Himma makes a systematic defence of the Coercion Thesis arguing that coercion or enforcement mechanisms are not only a necessary feature of legal systems, but a conceptually necessary feature of legal systems.
Bibliography, etc. Note
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Available in Other Form
Electronic version: Himma, Kenneth Einar Coercion and the Nature of Law Oxford : Oxford University Press USA, c 2020
Call Number
K579.D8 H56 2020
Language
English
ISBN
0198854935 hardcover
9780198854937 hardcover
9780198854937 hardcover
Record Appears in