@article{1198644,
      recid = {1198644},
      author = {Ripstein, Arthur, and Hathaway, Oona Anne, and Kutz,  Christopher, and McMahan, Jeff, and Mohamed, Saira,},
      title = {Rules for wrongdoers : law, morality, war /},
      abstract = {"Ripstein's lectures, which constitute the central texts  of this book, focus on the two bodies of rules governing  war: the jus ad bellum, which regulates resort to armed  force, and the jus in bello, which sets forth rules  governing the conduct of armed force and applies equally to  all parties. The lectures argue that both sets of rules  constitute prohibitions rather than permissions, and that  recognizing them as distinctive prohibitions can reconcile  the seeming tension between them. By understanding that the  central wrong of war is that war is the condition which  force decides, Ripstein contends that the law and morality  of war are in fact aligned; the rules governing the conduct  of hostilities must apply equally to parties in the right  and parties in the wrong in an armed conflict, because the  prohibitions outlined in the rules governing war are  prohibitions that restrain war. Ripstein's method of  analysis and the substantive argument he puts forward offer  an opportunity for rigorous critical engagement in  subsequent essays by commentators Hathaway, Kutz, and  McMahan, followed by a response from Ripstein"--},
      url = {http://lawcat.berkeley.edu/record/1198644},
      isbn = {9780197553978},
}