The bourgeois charm of Karl Marx and the ideological irony of American jurisprudence / by Dana Neacșu.
2020
K357 .N428 2020 (Mapit)
Available at Stacks
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Items
Details
Author
Title
The bourgeois charm of Karl Marx and the ideological irony of American jurisprudence / by Dana Neacșu.
Imprint
Leiden ; Boston : Brill, [2020]
Description
ix, 267 pages : illustrations (some color) ; 25 cm.
Series
Studies in critical social sciences ; v. 158.
Formatted Contents Note
Contextualizing Marx : Differentiating to Embrace or to Reject?
Marxian or Marxism : Labels Differentiating Content or Fabricating Difference?
Textual Differences and Marx's Interdisciplinary Dialectics
Private Subjectivity
Alienation and Theory Production
Ideology as Public (Political) Subjectivity
The Irony of Scholarship Production
Ideological Irony
S₂ Actuating T₁'s Irony
The Bearable Lightness of Jurisprudential Irony
Philosophical Camaraderie, Ideological Difference, and Irony
Irony, Jurisprudential Meaning-Making and Ideological Camaraderie.
Marxian or Marxism : Labels Differentiating Content or Fabricating Difference?
Textual Differences and Marx's Interdisciplinary Dialectics
Private Subjectivity
Alienation and Theory Production
Ideology as Public (Political) Subjectivity
The Irony of Scholarship Production
Ideological Irony
S₂ Actuating T₁'s Irony
The Bearable Lightness of Jurisprudential Irony
Philosophical Camaraderie, Ideological Difference, and Irony
Irony, Jurisprudential Meaning-Making and Ideological Camaraderie.
Summary
"The Bourgeois Charm of Karl Marx & the Ideological Irony of American Jurisprudence employs a well-known body of work, Marx's, to explain the inevitable limits of scholarship, in hopes to encourage academic boldness, and diversity, especially within American jurisprudence. While scholarly meaning-making has been addressed in specific academic areas, mostly linguistics and philosophy, it has never been addressed in a triangular relationship between the text (T1) and its instigator (S1), as well as its subsequent interpellator (S2). Furthermore, while addressed as a result of difference, it has never been addressed for today's liberal theory, which includes liberal jurisprudence, through the mirror of Marxist difference. Scholarship is the unique product of the instigator's private and public subjectivity, as all theory is aimed to be communicated and used by the scholarly community and beyond. Understanding its public life, textual instigators (S1) aim to control its meaning employing various research methods to observe reality and then to convey their narrative, or 'philosophy'. But meaning is not fixed; it is negotiated by S1 and those theories interpellate (S2), according to their own private and public subjectivity, which covers their ideology. Negotiated meaning is always a surprise to both S1 and S2, surprise which is both ironic and ideological. The book has ten chapters, an index and a list of references"-- Provided by publisher.
Bibliography, etc. Note
Includes bibliographical references (pages 237-261) and index.
Available in Other Form
Online version: Neacsu, Dana, The bourgeois charm of Karl Marx & the ideological irony of American jurisprudence Leiden ; Boston : Brill, [2020]
Call Number
K357 .N428 2020
Language
English
ISBN
9789004415584 (hardback ; alkaline paper)
9789004415591 (ebook)
9004415580
9789004415591 (ebook)
9004415580
Record Appears in