Judicial authority in EU Internal Market Law : implications for the balance of competences and powers / Vilija Vėlyvytė.
2022
KJE6569 .V45 2022 (Mapit)
Available at Stacks
Formats
Format | |
---|---|
BibTeX | |
MARCXML | |
TextMARC | |
MARC | |
DublinCore | |
EndNote | |
NLM | |
RefWorks | |
RIS |
Items
Details
Author
Title
Judicial authority in EU Internal Market Law : implications for the balance of competences and powers / Vilija Vėlyvytė.
Imprint
Oxford, UK ; New York, NY: Hart Publishing, 2022.
Copyright
©2022
Description
xxx, 273 pages ; 24 cm.
Series
Modern studies in European law ; v. 113.
Formatted Contents Note
1. An Unfree Court: Constitutional Constraints on the Exercise of EU Judicial Authority
2. Free Movement Case Law in Light of the Principle of Conferral
3. Free Movement Case Law in Light of the Principles of Subsidiarity and Proportionality
4. The Horizontal Balance of Powers: The Implications of Free Movement Case Law for the Principle of Institutional Balance
5. Rebalancing the Court, Rebalancing the EU.
2. Free Movement Case Law in Light of the Principle of Conferral
3. Free Movement Case Law in Light of the Principles of Subsidiarity and Proportionality
4. The Horizontal Balance of Powers: The Implications of Free Movement Case Law for the Principle of Institutional Balance
5. Rebalancing the Court, Rebalancing the EU.
Summary
This book examines the role of the European Court of Justice in the regulation of the internal market from a competence perspective. However, rather than focusing on the Court's role in enforcing the limits of EU competence in the EU's political decision making, it explores a related, albeit understudied, question: to what extent does the Court observe the constitutional limits of EU competence and its own institutional powers in the interpretation of EU internal market law laid down in the Treaties? The book provides an answer to this question through the analysis of EU free movement case law in light of the constitutional principles that govern the allocation of competences and powers in the EU: conferral, subsidiarity and proportionality, on the vertical level, and institutional balance, on the horizontal level. Why should the Court be bound by these principles? What do they mean when applied to judicial practice? To what extent are they observed in the free movement case law? The book argues that the Court's observance of the four principles has been inconsistent, thereby creating substantive and constitutional tensions in the EU's relationship with the Member States and upsetting the institutional balance of powers between the EU legislature and judiciary.
Note
Based on author's thesis (Ph.D.)
Bibliography, etc. Note
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Available in Other Form
ebook version :
Call Number
KJE6569 .V45 2022
Language
English
ISBN
1509938990 hardcover
9781509938995 hardcover
9781509939008 electronic publication
9781509939015 electronic book
9781509938995 hardcover
9781509939008 electronic publication
9781509939015 electronic book
Record Appears in