Conflict of laws and arbitral discretion : the closest connection test / Benjamin Hayward.
2017
Formats
Format | |
---|---|
BibTeX | |
MARCXML | |
TextMARC | |
MARC | |
DublinCore | |
EndNote | |
NLM | |
RefWorks | |
RIS |
Items
Details
Author
Title
Conflict of laws and arbitral discretion : the closest connection test / Benjamin Hayward.
Imprint
[New York] : Oxford University Press, [2017]
Description
1 online resource : illustrations (black and white).
Series
Oxford private international law series.
Summary
Arbitration is the dispute resolution method of choice in international commerce, but it rests on a complex legal foundation. In many international commercial contracts, the parties will choose the law governing any future disputes. However, where the parties do not choose a governing law, the prevailing approach in arbitration is to afford arbitrators broad and largely unfettered discretion to choose the law considered most appropriate or most applicable. The uncertainty resulting from this discretion potentially affects the parties' rights and obligations, the performance of their contract, the presentation of their cases, and negotiations undertaken to settle their disputes. This text critically reviews the prevailing approach to the conflict of laws in international commercial arbitration.
Note
Previously issued in print: 2017.
Arbitration is the dispute resolution method of choice in international commerce, but it rests on a complex legal foundation. In many international commercial contracts, the parties will choose the law governing any future disputes. However, where the parties do not choose a governing law, the prevailing approach in arbitration is to afford arbitrators broad and largely unfettered discretion to choose the law considered most appropriate or most applicable. The uncertainty resulting from this discretion potentially affects the parties' rights and obligations, the performance of their contract, the presentation of their cases, and negotiations undertaken to settle their disputes. This text critically reviews the prevailing approach to the conflict of laws in international commercial arbitration.
Arbitration is the dispute resolution method of choice in international commerce, but it rests on a complex legal foundation. In many international commercial contracts, the parties will choose the law governing any future disputes. However, where the parties do not choose a governing law, the prevailing approach in arbitration is to afford arbitrators broad and largely unfettered discretion to choose the law considered most appropriate or most applicable. The uncertainty resulting from this discretion potentially affects the parties' rights and obligations, the performance of their contract, the presentation of their cases, and negotiations undertaken to settle their disputes. This text critically reviews the prevailing approach to the conflict of laws in international commercial arbitration.
Bibliography, etc. Note
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Source of Description
Description based on online resource; title from home page (viewed on November 21, 2017).
Location
www
Available in Other Form
Print version :
Linked Resources
Alternate Title
Oxford Academic.
Oxford legal research library.
Oxford legal research library.
Language
English
Audience
Specialized.
ISBN
9780191829475 (ebook)
Record Appears in