In the Supreme Court of the United States, Masterpiece Cake Shop, Ltd., and Jack C. Phillips, petitioners, v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission; Charlie Craig; and David Mullins, respondents : on writ of certiorari to the Colorado Court of Appeals : amicus curiae brief of Ryan T. Anderson, Ph.D., and African-American and civil rights leaders in support of petitioners / Charles S. LiMandri, Paul M. Jonna, Jeffrey M. Trissell, Freedom of Conscience Defense Fund, counsel for amici curiae Ryan T. Anderson, Ph.D., et al.
LiMandri, Charles S., author.; Phillips, Jack (Baker), petitioner.; Craig, Charlie (Interior designer), respondent.; Mullins, David (Office manager), respondent.; Jonna, Paul M., author.; Trissell, Jeffrey M., author.; Anderson, Ryan T., 1981- amicus curiae.; Masterpiece Cakeshop (Firm), petitioner.; Colorado. Civil Rights Commission, respondent.; Freedom of Conscience Defense Fund, amicus curiae.; Colorado. Court of Appeals.; United States. Supreme Court.
2017
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Items
Details
Title
In the Supreme Court of the United States, Masterpiece Cake Shop, Ltd., and Jack C. Phillips, petitioners, v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission; Charlie Craig; and David Mullins, respondents : on writ of certiorari to the Colorado Court of Appeals : amicus curiae brief of Ryan T. Anderson, Ph.D., and African-American and civil rights leaders in support of petitioners / Charles S. LiMandri, Paul M. Jonna, Jeffrey M. Trissell, Freedom of Conscience Defense Fund, counsel for amici curiae Ryan T. Anderson, Ph.D., et al.
Added Author
Added Corporate Author
Variant Title
HeinOnline index title: Amicus curiae brief of Ryan T. Anderson, Ph.D., and African-American and civil rights leaders in support of petitioners
Imprint
[United States] : Cockle Legal Briefs, [2017]
Distributed
[Getzville, New York] : William S. Hein & Company, [2020]
Description
1 online resource (viii, 40, 10 pages).
Series
Civil rights and social justice.
LGBTQ+ rights.
LGBTQ+ rights.
Summary
In a case involving the balancing of public accommodation anti-discrimination laws and First Amendment rights, the question at issue is whether a cake maker can be compelled to design and make a cake that violates his sincerely held religious beliefs about same-sex marriage.
Note
"No. 16-111."
Bibliography, etc. Note
"Table of authorities"--Pages iii-xvi.
Source of Description
Description based on PDF title page, viewed September 15, 2020.
Location
www
Linked Resources
Alternate Title
HeinOnline.
Language
English
Record Appears in