In the Supreme Court of the United States, United States of America, petitioner, v. Edith Schlain Windsor and Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives, respondents : on writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit : amicus curiae brief of Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders and Lambda Legal Defense & Education Fund, Inc. in support of Edith Windsor and the United States addressing the merits and supporting affirmance / Paul M. Smith, counsel of record [and 9 others], attorneys for amici curiae.
Smith, Paul M. (Paul March), author.; Windsor, Edie, respondent.; United States, petitioner.; United States. Congress. House. Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group, respondent.; Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders, amicus curiae.; Lambda Legal Defense & Education Fund, amicus curiae.; United States. Supreme Court.; United States. Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
2013
Formats
Format | |
---|---|
BibTeX | |
MARCXML | |
TextMARC | |
MARC | |
DublinCore | |
EndNote | |
NLM | |
RefWorks | |
RIS |
Items
Details
Title
In the Supreme Court of the United States, United States of America, petitioner, v. Edith Schlain Windsor and Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives, respondents : on writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit : amicus curiae brief of Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders and Lambda Legal Defense & Education Fund, Inc. in support of Edith Windsor and the United States addressing the merits and supporting affirmance / Paul M. Smith, counsel of record [and 9 others], attorneys for amici curiae.
Added Author
Added Corporate Author
Variant Title
HeinOnline index title: Brief for Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders and Lambda Legal Defense & Education Fund, Inc. in Support of Petitioner Unite States and Respondent Edith Schlain Windsor
Imprint
[Washington, District of Columbia] : [Jenner & Block LLP?], [2013]
Distributed
[Getzville, New York] : William S. Hein & Company, [2020]
Description
1 online resource (vi, 39 pages).
Series
Civil rights and social justice.
LGBTQ+ rights.
LGBTQ+ rights.
Summary
Appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States concerning constitutionality of definition of marriage contained in federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) which precluded federal recognition of same sex marriages authorized under state law.
Note
"No. 12-307."
Bibliography, etc. Note
"Table of authorities"--Pages iii-vi.
Source of Description
Description based on PDF title page, viewed October 14, 2020.
Location
www
Linked Resources
Alternate Title
HeinOnline.
Language
English
Record Appears in