In the Supreme Court of the United States, Situ Kamu Wilkinson, petitioner, v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, respondent : on writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit : brief for former Executive Office for Immigration Review judges as amici curiae in support of petitioners / Thomas G. Sprankling, counsel of record, Claire M. Guehenno, Donna M. Farag.
2023
Formats
Format | |
---|---|
BibTeX | |
MARCXML | |
TextMARC | |
MARC | |
DublinCore | |
EndNote | |
NLM | |
RefWorks | |
RIS |
Items
Details
Title
In the Supreme Court of the United States, Situ Kamu Wilkinson, petitioner, v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, respondent : on writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit : brief for former Executive Office for Immigration Review judges as amici curiae in support of petitioners / Thomas G. Sprankling, counsel of record, Claire M. Guehenno, Donna M. Farag.
Added Author
Added Corporate Author
Variant Title
HeinOnline index title: Brief amici curiae of former Executive Office for Immigration Review judges
Imprint
[United States] : [publisher not identified], [2023]
Distributed
[Getzville, New York] : William S. Hein & Company, [2024]
Description
1 online resource (vii, 16, 4a pages).
Series
Immigration law & policy in the U.S.
Summary
The question presented is whether an an agency determination that a given set of established facts does not rise to the statutory standard of "exceptional and extremely unusual hardship" a mixed question of law and fact reviewable under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D), or instead a discretionary judgment call unreviewable under Section 1252(a)(2)(B)(i)?
Note
"No. 22-666."
"September 2023"--Page 16.
"September 2023"--Page 16.
Bibliography, etc. Note
"Table of authorities": pages iii-vii.
Source of Description
Description based on PDF title page, viewed February 3, 2024.
Location
www
Linked Resources
Alternate Title
HeinOnline.
Language
English
Record Appears in