The Logic of Persecution : Free Expression and the McCarthy Era / Martin H. Redish.
2022
Formats
Format | |
---|---|
BibTeX | |
MARCXML | |
TextMARC | |
MARC | |
DublinCore | |
EndNote | |
NLM | |
RefWorks | |
RIS |
Items
Details
Author
Title
The Logic of Persecution : Free Expression and the McCarthy Era / Martin H. Redish.
Imprint
Stanford, CA : Stanford University Press, [2022]
Copyright
©2005
Description
1 online resource (320 p.)
Formatted Contents Note
Frontmatter
Contents
Preface
1. Introduction: Logic, History, and the McCarthy Era
2. The Legal Topography of the McCarthy Era
3. McCarthyism, Free Expression, and the Role of Pathology in American History
4. Unlawful Advocacy, Free Speech, and the McCarthy Era
5. HUAC, The Hollywood Ten, and the First Amendment Right of Nonassociation
6. Public Education, Free Speech, and the McCarthy Era
7. Conclusion: The McCarthy Era as a First Amendment Laboratory
Notes
Index
Contents
Preface
1. Introduction: Logic, History, and the McCarthy Era
2. The Legal Topography of the McCarthy Era
3. McCarthyism, Free Expression, and the Role of Pathology in American History
4. Unlawful Advocacy, Free Speech, and the McCarthy Era
5. HUAC, The Hollywood Ten, and the First Amendment Right of Nonassociation
6. Public Education, Free Speech, and the McCarthy Era
7. Conclusion: The McCarthy Era as a First Amendment Laboratory
Notes
Index
Summary
This book demonstrates that neither the current liberal nor conservative position on the McCarthy era provides the basis for an appropriate normative perspective. Adding the perspective of the theory of free expression, it becomes apparent that both sides have ignored a vitally important point. While recently declassified documents demonstrate widespread participation by American Communists in conducting or facilitating espionage, much of the negative treatment received by American Communists had little or nothing to do with such activity. From the perspective of the First Amendment right of free speech, there exists a significant difference between speech that advocates conduct, on the one hand, and speech that itself is part of a nonspeech criminal act, such as espionage, on the other. By helping to separate protected speech from unprotected "speech-acts," First Amendment theory can do much to distinguish between the legitimate governmental responses to American Communism and those that contravened basic notions of communicative freedom protected by the Constitution. At the same time, by focusing the First Amendment inquiry on the McCarthy era, one should be able to glean insights about the broader implications of free speech protection.
Language Note
In English.
System Details Note
Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
Source of Description
Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 29. Jun 2022)
Location
www
In
Title is part of eBook package: Stanford University Press Backlist eBook-Package 2000-2013 De Gruyter
Available in Other Form
print
Access Note
restricted access (http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec) online access with authorization
Alternate Title
DeGruyter online
Language
English
ISBN
9781503624177
Record Appears in