Canceling lawyers : case studies of criticism, toleration, and tragic choices / W. Bradley Wendell.
2024
Formats
Format | |
---|---|
BibTeX | |
MARCXML | |
TextMARC | |
MARC | |
DublinCore | |
EndNote | |
NLM | |
RefWorks | |
RIS |
Items
Details
Title
Canceling lawyers : case studies of criticism, toleration, and tragic choices / W. Bradley Wendell.
Imprint
New York, NY : Oxford University Press, 2024.
Description
1 online resource.
Series
Oxford scholarship online.
Summary
Lawyers take pride in a professional tradition of representing unpopular clients, understanding that it as a contribution to the rule of law and the practice of toleration in a polarized society. This does not mean that lawyers are fully insulated from criticism for the clients they represent. The seemingly intractable debate over accountability for representing nasty clients is in part the result of a deep, structural tension between the institutions and procesdures of the legal system, and the underlying issues and controversies about which people disagree. Using a series of case studies, this text examines this topic.
Note
Also issued in print: 2024.
Lawyers take pride in a professional tradition of representing unpopular clients, understanding that it as a contribution to the rule of law and the practice of toleration in a polarized society. This does not mean that lawyers are fully insulated from criticism for the clients they represent. The seemingly intractable debate over accountability for representing nasty clients is in part the result of a deep, structural tension between the institutions and procesdures of the legal system, and the underlying issues and controversies about which people disagree. Using a series of case studies, this text examines this topic.
Lawyers take pride in a professional tradition of representing unpopular clients, understanding that it as a contribution to the rule of law and the practice of toleration in a polarized society. This does not mean that lawyers are fully insulated from criticism for the clients they represent. The seemingly intractable debate over accountability for representing nasty clients is in part the result of a deep, structural tension between the institutions and procesdures of the legal system, and the underlying issues and controversies about which people disagree. Using a series of case studies, this text examines this topic.
Bibliography, etc. Note
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Source of Description
Description based on online resource and publisher information; title from PDF title page (viewed on January 4, 2024).
Location
www
Available in Other Form
Print version :
Linked Resources
Alternate Title
Oxford Academic.
Language
English
Audience
Specialized.
ISBN
9780197673454 ebook
Record Appears in