A Supreme Court unlike any other : the deepening divide between the justices and the people / Kevin J. McMahon.
2024
Formats
Format | |
---|---|
BibTeX | |
MARCXML | |
TextMARC | |
MARC | |
DublinCore | |
EndNote | |
NLM | |
RefWorks | |
RIS |
Items
Details
Author
Title
A Supreme Court unlike any other : the deepening divide between the justices and the people / Kevin J. McMahon.
Imprint
Chicago ; London : The University of Chicago Press 2024.
Copyright
©2024
Description
1 online resource : illustrations
Formatted Contents Note
Preface: Democracy in court? : presidents and justices
The Supreme Court's democracy gap and the erosion of legitimacy
Part I. Constructing a historically distinct court : how the conservative quest for judicial success isolated the justices from majoritarian democracy. Numerical minority justices as a conservative majority
An electoral-confirmation connection and the historical rarity of a contested justice
How a resurgent Senate tamed the judicial desires of electorally dominant presidents
Polarized politics and the Court's legitimacy paradox
Part II. Searching for wizards of the law : how the rise of the supreme elite further distanced the Court from the American people. How the redefinition of quality created a cookie-cutter court
Choosing right : how conservative efforts to eliminate ideological drift stifled Republican presidential choice
Democratic presidents and the avoidance of confirmation conflict
How the selection of unknown voices with different audiences transformed the Court into a judicial aristocracy
Part III. Legitimacy on the campaign trail : can electoral success by judicially focused candidates reduce the Court's democracy gap? The Court issue and the presidential election of 2016
The "Kavanaugh effect" and the 2018 Senate elections
The never-ending promise of a conservative court and the 2020 presidential election
Concluding section: Confronting detours and dead ends : liberal resistance and frustration in the age of conservative dominance on the Court. How a numerical minority rules the law and prevents progressive political change
Reducing the democracy gap at the coalface of constitutional politics.
The Supreme Court's democracy gap and the erosion of legitimacy
Part I. Constructing a historically distinct court : how the conservative quest for judicial success isolated the justices from majoritarian democracy. Numerical minority justices as a conservative majority
An electoral-confirmation connection and the historical rarity of a contested justice
How a resurgent Senate tamed the judicial desires of electorally dominant presidents
Polarized politics and the Court's legitimacy paradox
Part II. Searching for wizards of the law : how the rise of the supreme elite further distanced the Court from the American people. How the redefinition of quality created a cookie-cutter court
Choosing right : how conservative efforts to eliminate ideological drift stifled Republican presidential choice
Democratic presidents and the avoidance of confirmation conflict
How the selection of unknown voices with different audiences transformed the Court into a judicial aristocracy
Part III. Legitimacy on the campaign trail : can electoral success by judicially focused candidates reduce the Court's democracy gap? The Court issue and the presidential election of 2016
The "Kavanaugh effect" and the 2018 Senate elections
The never-ending promise of a conservative court and the 2020 presidential election
Concluding section: Confronting detours and dead ends : liberal resistance and frustration in the age of conservative dominance on the Court. How a numerical minority rules the law and prevents progressive political change
Reducing the democracy gap at the coalface of constitutional politics.
Summary
A data-rich examination of the US Supreme Court's unprecedented detachment from the democratic processes that buttress its legitimacy. Today's Supreme Court is unlike any other in American history. This is not just because of its jurisprudence but also because the current Court has a tenuous relationship with the democratic processes that help establish its authority. Historically, this "democracy gap" was not nearly as severe as it is today. Simply put, past Supreme Courts were constructed in a fashion far more in line with the promise of democracy--that the people decide and the majority rules. Drawing on historical and contemporary data alongside a deep knowledge of court battles during presidencies ranging from FDR to Donald Trump, Kevin J. McMahon charts the developments that brought us here. McMahon offers insight into the altered politics of nominating and confirming justices, the shifting pool of Supreme Court hopefuls, and the increased salience of the Court in elections. A Supreme Court Unlike Any Other is an eye-opening account of today's Court within the context of US history and the broader structure of contemporary politics.
Bibliography, etc. Note
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Source of Description
Description based on online resource; title from digital title page (viewed June 26, 2024)
Available in Other Form
Print version: McMahon, Kevin J. Supreme Court unlike any other. Chicago ; London : The University of Chicago Press, 2024
Linked Resources
Language
English
ISBN
9780226831077 ebook
0226831078 ebook
9780226831060 cloth
9780226831084 paper
0226831078 ebook
9780226831060 cloth
9780226831084 paper
Record Appears in