Dartmouth College v. Woodward : colleges, corporations and the common good / Adam R. Nelson.
2025
KF228.D3 N45 2025 (Mapit)
On loan from Stacks, due 24. Jan 2026
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Items
Details
Author
Title
Dartmouth College v. Woodward : colleges, corporations and the common good / Adam R. Nelson.
Imprint
Lawrence, Kansas : University Press of Kansas, [2025]
Copyright
©2025
Description
viii, 270 pages ; 22 cm.
Series
Landmark law cases & American society.
Formatted Contents Note
A quest for a charter
Incorporation ... and ill will
Public support and public supervision
Corporations, contracts, and the Constitution
Who controls the college? Who controls the church?
Dartmouth College v. Dartmouth University
Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward
Founders and first donors
Advice from a "high authority"
"It is, sir, a small college, and yet there are those who love it"
How to win friends and influence justices
The Marshall Court decides
"New facts" ... and new foundations
"A university ... under the auspices and control of the legislature
Colleges, contracts, and the common good.
Incorporation ... and ill will
Public support and public supervision
Corporations, contracts, and the Constitution
Who controls the college? Who controls the church?
Dartmouth College v. Dartmouth University
Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward
Founders and first donors
Advice from a "high authority"
"It is, sir, a small college, and yet there are those who love it"
How to win friends and influence justices
The Marshall Court decides
"New facts" ... and new foundations
"A university ... under the auspices and control of the legislature
Colleges, contracts, and the common good.
Summary
"Dartmouth College v. Woodward examines the landmark case decided by the United States Supreme Court in 1819 after New Hampshire's state legislature attempted to amend Dartmouth's charter to place the college under greater public control. Adam R. Nelson interprets the case not only as one about higher-education governance or American corporate law in an emerging constitutional order, and not simply as a case about the Marshall Court's preference for 'private' over 'public' initiative as the primary driver of social and commercial development. More fundamentally, Nelson uses the case to illustrate a broad ideological shift from commonwealth republicanism to market liberalism in both education and jurisprudence during the early nineteenth century. The question at the heart of the case was: should Dartmouth College be subject to legislative authority? This book finds that when the state court said 'yes' but the US Supreme Court said 'no,' the divergence between these decisions stemmed not only from different applications of the contracts clause but also from disagreements about the degree to which core institutions in a democracy--whether colleges or churches or companies--should be overseen or regulated by political majorities. Implicit in the Dartmouth case, though never clarified, was the question of whether higher education was a private or public good, and thus whether colleges are better off under private or public control. By choosing the private path, Dartmouth reinforced a gradual privatization of what might otherwise have been considered public goods. Americans today live with the consequences of this decision" -- Publisher's description.
Bibliography, etc. Note
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Available in Other Form
Online version: Nelson, Adam R. Dartmouth College v. Woodward. Lawrence : University Press of Kansas, [2025]
Call Number
KF228.D3 N45 2025
Language
English
ISBN
9780700638673 (cloth)
0700638679 (cloth)
9780700638680 (paperback)
0700638687 (paperback)
9780700638697 (ebook)
0700638679 (cloth)
9780700638680 (paperback)
0700638687 (paperback)
9780700638697 (ebook)
Record Appears in