Corporate jurisdiction, academic heresy, and fraternal correction at the University of Paris, 1200-1400 / by Gregory S. Moule.
2016
KBR134.P37 M68 2016
Available at Robbins Stacks
Formats
Format | |
---|---|
BibTeX | |
MARCXML | |
TextMARC | |
MARC | |
DublinCore | |
EndNote | |
NLM | |
RefWorks | |
RIS |
Items
Details
Author
Title
Corporate jurisdiction, academic heresy, and fraternal correction at the University of Paris, 1200-1400 / by Gregory S. Moule.
Imprint
Leiden ; Boston : Brill, 2016.
Description
xvi, 374 pages ; 25 cm.
Series
Education and society in the Middle Ages and Renaissance ; v. 51.
Formatted Contents Note
The Foulechat controversy
The Monteson controversy
The factors affecting the faculty's jurisdiction
Medieval concepts of jurisdiction
Corporate theory and the faculty of theology
The role of the bachelors in the faculty
The office of the Chancellor
The office of the Dean
The Chancellor and the masters: their relations
The conflict of 1219-1228
The right to make statutes
The model and the secular-mendicant controversy
The model of shared jurisdiction: the contribution of Gratian
The model of shared jurisdiction: the contribution of the Decretists
The contributions of Johannes Teutonicus, Vincentius Hispanus, and Damasus
The contributions of Goffredus de Trano
The contributions of Innocent IV
Bernard of Parma and the ordinary gloss
The contributions of Hostiensis
The contributions ofJohannes Andreae
The contributions of Baldus de Ubaldis
The distribution of jurisdiction within the chapter
The crime of Heresy and the jurisdiction of the chapter
Jean Gerson and the censure of Heresy
The Canon Law of Heresy and the jurisdiction of the faculty of theology
The roles of outside agents in the censure of academic Heresy
The investigative process in faculty and chapter
John of Monteson and the theological faculty's jurisdiction
The Tractatus, or Apologia, of Pierre d'Ailly
Analysis of the Tractatus, or, Apologia
The Arguments from Papal privilege and human law
The argument from divine law
The argument from custom
The role of custom in the legal system
The territorial scope of the faculty's jurisdiction
D'Ailly's response to Monteson
Evaluation of d'Ailly's argument
The chronological development of the faculty's jurisdiction
Fraternal correction and the Parisian faculty of theology
The sources of faternal correction
Fracternal correction in the process of censure at Paris
Judas, fraternal correction, and the Parisian faculty of theology
The treatment of Judas by Christ at the Last Supper
The rule of Augustine and fraternal correction
The duty to render fraternal correction and its possible omission
The contribution of Augustine
Judicial correction and the omission of fraternal correction
The issue of proof
The Revocatio Conditionalis and the oath to report suspect teaching
Suspect teaching and the definition of a secret sin
The contribution of John Baconthorpe
The issue of incorrigibility
Public correction and the presence of scandal
The contributions of Humbert of Romans, OP, and Nicholas of Gorran, OP.
The Monteson controversy
The factors affecting the faculty's jurisdiction
Medieval concepts of jurisdiction
Corporate theory and the faculty of theology
The role of the bachelors in the faculty
The office of the Chancellor
The office of the Dean
The Chancellor and the masters: their relations
The conflict of 1219-1228
The right to make statutes
The model and the secular-mendicant controversy
The model of shared jurisdiction: the contribution of Gratian
The model of shared jurisdiction: the contribution of the Decretists
The contributions of Johannes Teutonicus, Vincentius Hispanus, and Damasus
The contributions of Goffredus de Trano
The contributions of Innocent IV
Bernard of Parma and the ordinary gloss
The contributions of Hostiensis
The contributions ofJohannes Andreae
The contributions of Baldus de Ubaldis
The distribution of jurisdiction within the chapter
The crime of Heresy and the jurisdiction of the chapter
Jean Gerson and the censure of Heresy
The Canon Law of Heresy and the jurisdiction of the faculty of theology
The roles of outside agents in the censure of academic Heresy
The investigative process in faculty and chapter
John of Monteson and the theological faculty's jurisdiction
The Tractatus, or Apologia, of Pierre d'Ailly
Analysis of the Tractatus, or, Apologia
The Arguments from Papal privilege and human law
The argument from divine law
The argument from custom
The role of custom in the legal system
The territorial scope of the faculty's jurisdiction
D'Ailly's response to Monteson
Evaluation of d'Ailly's argument
The chronological development of the faculty's jurisdiction
Fraternal correction and the Parisian faculty of theology
The sources of faternal correction
Fracternal correction in the process of censure at Paris
Judas, fraternal correction, and the Parisian faculty of theology
The treatment of Judas by Christ at the Last Supper
The rule of Augustine and fraternal correction
The duty to render fraternal correction and its possible omission
The contribution of Augustine
Judicial correction and the omission of fraternal correction
The issue of proof
The Revocatio Conditionalis and the oath to report suspect teaching
Suspect teaching and the definition of a secret sin
The contribution of John Baconthorpe
The issue of incorrigibility
Public correction and the presence of scandal
The contributions of Humbert of Romans, OP, and Nicholas of Gorran, OP.
Bibliography, etc. Note
Includes bibliographical references (pages 347-362) and indexes.
Location
RBLL2
Available in Other Form
Online version: Moule, Gregory S., author. Corporate jurisdiction, academic heresy, and fraternal correction at the University of Paris, 1200-1400 Boston : Brill, 2016
Call Number
KBR134.P37 M68 2016
Language
English
ISBN
9789004311329 hardback alkaline paper
9004311327 hardback alkaline paper
9004311327 hardback alkaline paper
Record Appears in