Feminist judgments : rewritten opinions of the United States Supreme Court / Kathryn M. Stanchi, Temple University, School of Law; Linda L. Berger, University of Nevada Las Vegas, School of Law; Bridget J. Crawford, Pace University, School of Law.
2016
KF478 .S69 2016 (Mapit)
Available at Stacks
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Items
Details
Author
Title
Feminist judgments : rewritten opinions of the United States Supreme Court / Kathryn M. Stanchi, Temple University, School of Law; Linda L. Berger, University of Nevada Las Vegas, School of Law; Bridget J. Crawford, Pace University, School of Law.
Imprint
New York NY : Cambridge University Press, 2016.
Description
xlvii, 566 pages ; 23 cm.
Series
Feminist judgments series.
Formatted Contents Note
Introduction to the U.S. Feminist Judgments Project / Kathryn M. Stanchi, Linda L. Berger and Bridget J. Crawford
Talking back : from feminist history and theory to feminist legal methods and judgments / Berta Esperanza Hernández-Truyol
Bradwell v. Illinois, 83 U.S. 130 (1873) / Kimberly Holst, Phyllis Goldfarb
Muller v. Oregon, 208 U.S. 412 (1908) / Andrea Doneff, Pamela Laufer-Ukeles
Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965) / Cynthia Hawkins DeBose, Laura Rosenbury
Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967) / Inga N. Laurent, Teri McMurtry-Chubb
Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645 (1972) / Nancy D. Polikoff, Karen Syma Czapanskiy
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973) / Rachel Rebouche, Kimberly M. Mutcherson
Frontiero v. Richardson, 411 U.S. 677 (1973) / Iselin M. Gambert, Dara E. Purvis
Geduldig v. Aiello, 417 U.S. 484 (1974) / Maya Manian, Lucinda M. Finley
Dothard v. Rawlinson, 433 U.S. 321 (1977) / Brenda A. Smith, Maria L. Ontiveros
City of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power v. Manhart, 435 U.S. 702 (1978) / Cassandra Jones Havard, Tracy A. Thomas
Harris v. McRae, 448 U.S. 297 (1980) / Mary Ziegler, Leslie C. Griffin
Michael M. v. Superior Court, 450 U.S. 464 (1981) / Margo Kaplan, Cynthia Godsoe
Rostker v. Goldberg, 453 U.S. 57 (1981) / Jamie R. Abrams, Davis S. Cohen
Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57 (1986) / Kristen Konrad Tiscione, Angela Onwuachi-Willig
Johnson v. Transportation Agency, 480 U.S. 616 (1987) / Deborah Gordon, Deborah L. Rhode
Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228 (1989) / Dale Margolin Cecka, Martha Chamallas
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992) / Macarena Saez, Lisa R. Pruitt
United States v. Virginia, 518 U.S. 515 (1996) / Christine M. Venter, Valorie K. Vojdik
Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc., 523 U.S. 75 (1998) / Margaret E. Johnson, Ann C. McGinley
Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School District, 524 U.S. 274 (1998) / Michelle S. Simon, Ann Bartow
United States v. Morrison, 529 U.S. 598 (2000) / Shaakirrah R. Sanders, Anibal Rosario Lebron
Nguyen v. INS, 533 U.S. 53 (2001) / Sandra S. Park, Ilene Durst
Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003) / Kris McDaniel-Miccio, Ruthann Robson
Town of Castle Rock v. Gonzales, 545 U.S. 748 (2005) / Patricia A. Broussard, Maria Isabel Medina
Obergefell v. Hodges, 135 S. Ct. 2584 (2015) / Erez Aloni, Carlos A. Ball.
Talking back : from feminist history and theory to feminist legal methods and judgments / Berta Esperanza Hernández-Truyol
Bradwell v. Illinois, 83 U.S. 130 (1873) / Kimberly Holst, Phyllis Goldfarb
Muller v. Oregon, 208 U.S. 412 (1908) / Andrea Doneff, Pamela Laufer-Ukeles
Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965) / Cynthia Hawkins DeBose, Laura Rosenbury
Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967) / Inga N. Laurent, Teri McMurtry-Chubb
Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645 (1972) / Nancy D. Polikoff, Karen Syma Czapanskiy
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973) / Rachel Rebouche, Kimberly M. Mutcherson
Frontiero v. Richardson, 411 U.S. 677 (1973) / Iselin M. Gambert, Dara E. Purvis
Geduldig v. Aiello, 417 U.S. 484 (1974) / Maya Manian, Lucinda M. Finley
Dothard v. Rawlinson, 433 U.S. 321 (1977) / Brenda A. Smith, Maria L. Ontiveros
City of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power v. Manhart, 435 U.S. 702 (1978) / Cassandra Jones Havard, Tracy A. Thomas
Harris v. McRae, 448 U.S. 297 (1980) / Mary Ziegler, Leslie C. Griffin
Michael M. v. Superior Court, 450 U.S. 464 (1981) / Margo Kaplan, Cynthia Godsoe
Rostker v. Goldberg, 453 U.S. 57 (1981) / Jamie R. Abrams, Davis S. Cohen
Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57 (1986) / Kristen Konrad Tiscione, Angela Onwuachi-Willig
Johnson v. Transportation Agency, 480 U.S. 616 (1987) / Deborah Gordon, Deborah L. Rhode
Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228 (1989) / Dale Margolin Cecka, Martha Chamallas
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992) / Macarena Saez, Lisa R. Pruitt
United States v. Virginia, 518 U.S. 515 (1996) / Christine M. Venter, Valorie K. Vojdik
Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc., 523 U.S. 75 (1998) / Margaret E. Johnson, Ann C. McGinley
Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School District, 524 U.S. 274 (1998) / Michelle S. Simon, Ann Bartow
United States v. Morrison, 529 U.S. 598 (2000) / Shaakirrah R. Sanders, Anibal Rosario Lebron
Nguyen v. INS, 533 U.S. 53 (2001) / Sandra S. Park, Ilene Durst
Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003) / Kris McDaniel-Miccio, Ruthann Robson
Town of Castle Rock v. Gonzales, 545 U.S. 748 (2005) / Patricia A. Broussard, Maria Isabel Medina
Obergefell v. Hodges, 135 S. Ct. 2584 (2015) / Erez Aloni, Carlos A. Ball.
Summary
"What would United States Supreme Court opinions look like if key decisions on gender issues were written with a feminist perspective? Feminist Judgments brings together a group of scholars and lawyers to rewrite, using feminist reasoning, the most significant U.S. Supreme Court cases on gender from the 1800s to the present day. The twenty-five opinions in this volume demonstrate that judges with feminist viewpoints could have changed the course of the law. The rewritten decisions reveal that previously accepted judicial outcomes were not necessary or inevitable and demonstrate that feminist reasoning increases the judicial capacity for justice. Feminist Judgments opens a path for a long overdue discussion of the real impact of judicial diversity on the law as well as the influence of perspective on judging"--Publisher's website.
Bibliography, etc. Note
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Location
STA
Call Number
KF478 .S69 2016
Language
English
ISBN
9781107126626 hardback
1107126622 hardback
9781107565609 paperback
110756560X paperback
1107126622 hardback
9781107565609 paperback
110756560X paperback
Record Appears in