The river pollution dilemma in Victorian England : nuisance law versus economic efficiency / Leslie Rosenthal.
2014
KD3375 .R67 2014 (Mapit)
Available at Stacks
Formats
Format | |
---|---|
BibTeX | |
MARCXML | |
TextMARC | |
MARC | |
DublinCore | |
EndNote | |
NLM | |
RefWorks | |
RIS |
Items
Details
Title
The river pollution dilemma in Victorian England : nuisance law versus economic efficiency / Leslie Rosenthal.
Imprint
Farnham, Surrey, England : Ashgate Publishing, [2014]
Copyright
©2014.
Description
xiv, 253 pages : maps ; 24 cm.
Series
Modern economic and social history series.
Formatted Contents Note
Introduction. The river pollution dilemma
Victorian Britain I : public health and local government
Victorian Britain II : river pollution and sanitary engineering
Nuisance law and nuisance economics
Nuisance law
Nuisance economics
Nuisance management
Birmingham, Adderley and the River Tame
Attorney-General v. Birmingham
Attorney-General v. Birmingham
Delays and contingencies : Leeds and Barnsley
Leeds : Attorney-General v. Leeds
Barnsley : Attorney-General v. Barnsley (1873, 1874)
The threat of sequestration : Leamington Spa and Tunbridge Wells
Leamington Spa : Heath (and Field) v. Wallington
Tunbridge Wells : Goldsmid v. Tunbridge Wells
Negotiation and settlement : Harrogate and the St. Helens Canal
Harrogate : Wood v. High and Low Harrogate (1870, 1874)
St. Helens Canal : Legh v. St. Helens Canal and Railway Company
The tactic of diversion : Northampton and the Brinsop Hall Coal Company
Northampton : Harrold v. Markham (1869) and Monk v. Northampton
Brinsop Hall : Pennington v. Brinsop Hall Coal Company (1877, 1882)
Protection by statutory legislation : Wolverhampton
Wolverhampton : Giffard v. Wolverhampton (1874, 1886)
Wolverhampton : the Wolverhampton Corporation Act
Conclusions.
Victorian Britain I : public health and local government
Victorian Britain II : river pollution and sanitary engineering
Nuisance law and nuisance economics
Nuisance law
Nuisance economics
Nuisance management
Birmingham, Adderley and the River Tame
Attorney-General v. Birmingham
Attorney-General v. Birmingham
Delays and contingencies : Leeds and Barnsley
Leeds : Attorney-General v. Leeds
Barnsley : Attorney-General v. Barnsley (1873, 1874)
The threat of sequestration : Leamington Spa and Tunbridge Wells
Leamington Spa : Heath (and Field) v. Wallington
Tunbridge Wells : Goldsmid v. Tunbridge Wells
Negotiation and settlement : Harrogate and the St. Helens Canal
Harrogate : Wood v. High and Low Harrogate (1870, 1874)
St. Helens Canal : Legh v. St. Helens Canal and Railway Company
The tactic of diversion : Northampton and the Brinsop Hall Coal Company
Northampton : Harrold v. Markham (1869) and Monk v. Northampton
Brinsop Hall : Pennington v. Brinsop Hall Coal Company (1877, 1882)
Protection by statutory legislation : Wolverhampton
Wolverhampton : Giffard v. Wolverhampton (1874, 1886)
Wolverhampton : the Wolverhampton Corporation Act
Conclusions.
Bibliography, etc. Note
Includes bibliographical references (pages 235-244) and index.
Location
STA
Call Number
KD3375 .R67 2014
Language
English
ISBN
9781409441823 hardcover alkaline paper
1409441822 hardcover alkaline paper
9781409441830 (ebook)
9781472404206 (epub)
1409441822 hardcover alkaline paper
9781409441830 (ebook)
9781472404206 (epub)
Record Appears in