The concluding argument of Conway Robinson, as counsel for the appellants, in the case of the Bank of Washington v. Arthur &c., heard before the Court of Appeals of Virginia, in Lewisburg, at July term 1846 : wherein is discussed the rule on which courts of Equity Act, when asked to interfere with securities alleged to be founded on a usurious or gaming consideration.
1846
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Items
Details
Author
Title
The concluding argument of Conway Robinson, as counsel for the appellants, in the case of the Bank of Washington v. Arthur &c., heard before the Court of Appeals of Virginia, in Lewisburg, at July term 1846 : wherein is discussed the rule on which courts of Equity Act, when asked to interfere with securities alleged to be founded on a usurious or gaming consideration.
Added Author
Added Corporate Author
Imprint
Richmond : Printed by Shepherd and Colin, 1846.
Description
36 pages.
Series
Making of modern law. Trials, 1600-1926.
Note
Reproduction of the original from Harvard Law School Library.
Linked Resources
Language
English
Reproduction
Electronic reproduction. Farmington Hills, Mich. : Gale, a part of Cengage Learning, 2007. Available via the World Wide Web. Access limited by licensing agreements.
Record Appears in