Are finders keepers? This most simple of questions has long evaded a satisfactory legal answer. Generally it seems to have been accepted that a finder acquires a property right in the object of her find and can protect it from subsequent interference, but even this turns out to be the baldest statement of principle, resting on obscure and confused authority. This first full-length treatment of finders sets them in their legal-historical context, and discovers a fascinating area of law lying at the crossroads of crime, obligations, and property. That on the same facts a finder might be thief, bailee, and/or property right holder has clouded our conceptual analysis, and prevented us from stating simply our rules about finding. Nonetheless, when the applicable doctrines and policies of our property law are explored, and particularly the central concept of possession, we can argue confidently that, despite centuries of doubt and confusion, English law has succeeded in producing a body of law that is theoretically and practically coherent.
Revised version of the author's doctoral thesis.
Bibliography, etc. Note
Includes bibliographical references (pages -175) and index.
Formatted Contents Note
The legal context of Armory The possessor of land cases The significance of the facts of loss The obligations of a finder Possession and the rights of finders Qualifications on the acquisition of right Defending the doctrines The terminology of possession and property.