Nothing to hide : the false tradeoff between privacy and security / Daniel J. Solove.

The nothing-to-hide argument
The all-or-nothing fallacy
The danger of deference
Why privacy isn't merely an individual right
The pendulum argument
The national-security argument
The problem with dissolving the crime-espionage distinction
The war-powers argument and the rule of law
The Fourth Amendment and the secrecy paradigm
The third party doctrine and digital dossiers
The failure of looking for a reasonable expectation of privacy
The suspicionless-searches argument
Should we keep the exclusionary rule?
The first amendment as criminal procedure
Will repealing the Patriot Act restore our privacy?
The law-and-technology problem and the leave-it-to-the-legislature argument
Video surveillance and the no-privacy-in-public argument
Should the government engage in data mining?
The Luddite argument, the Titanic phenomenon, and the fix-a-problem strategy
Conclusion.