Argument delivered before the judges of the Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, in the case of Carter's executors, appellants against Cutting and others, appellees / by John Browne Cutting, occasioned by the necessary absence of one of his counsel, March 30, 1816 : chiefly intended to demonstrate that by operation of the gaming statues, no gaming security can be rendered valid by devise.
1817
Formats
Format | |
---|---|
BibTeX | |
MARCXML | |
TextMARC | |
MARC | |
DublinCore | |
EndNote | |
NLM | |
RefWorks | |
RIS |
Items
Details
Title
Argument delivered before the judges of the Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, in the case of Carter's executors, appellants against Cutting and others, appellees / by John Browne Cutting, occasioned by the necessary absence of one of his counsel, March 30, 1816 : chiefly intended to demonstrate that by operation of the gaming statues, no gaming security can be rendered valid by devise.
Added Author
Imprint
Fredericksburg : [publisher not identified], 1817.
Description
iv, [3]-34 pages.
Series
Making of modern law. Trials, 1600-1926.
Note
"Chiefly intended to demonstrate that by the operation of the gaming statutes no gaming security can be rendered valid by devise."
Reproduction of the original from Harvard Law School Library.
Reproduction of the original from Harvard Law School Library.
Linked Resources
Language
English
Reproduction
Electronic reproduction. Farmington Hills, Mich. : Gale, a part of Cengage Learning, 2007. Available via the World Wide Web. Access limited by licensing agreements.
Record Appears in