A letter to the chief justice of the United States
Historical development of legal rhetoric and Supreme Court oral arguments
Do oral arguments before the Supreme Court matter? a simple explanation
New question: oral arguments "matter," but how do we make sense of them? a modest proposal
Critical theories and research questions: proposing a method to capture the madness of oral arguments
The many faces of oral argument: oral argument's purposes and the justices' styles
Arguing about "bong hits 4 Jesus": testing theory and method in Morse v. Frederick
Making sense of child rapists in Kennedy v. Louisiana: a firsthand observation
Historical repercussions of judicial sensemaking: District of Columbia v. Dick Anthony Heller
The ground covered and new ground to uncover: responding to critics, offering recommendations, and a final letter to the chief justice
Biased sensemaking: compromising the court's rhetorical authority.