A primer on higher education law in the United States
A brief history of higher education litigation in the United States Supreme Court
Making it to the Supreme Court and the rise of purposive organizations
The traditional model of higher education in the litigation spotlight : United States v. Fordice
Hopwood v. Texas: "a university may properly favor one applicant over another because of his ability to play the cello, make a downfield tackle, or understand chaos theory"
Abrams v. Baylor College of Medicine : Jews need not apply
Axson-Flynn v. Johnson : "talk to some other mormon girls who are good mormons, who don't have a problem with this"
Location, location, location : Richards v. League of United Latin American citizens and the cartography of colleges
Clark v. Claremont University Center : "I mean, us white people have rights, too"
The developing law of faculty discontent : the Garcetti effect.