Complex equality and the Court of Justice of the European Union : reconciling diversity and harmonisation / by Richard Lang ; with foreword by Mark Bell.
2018
KJE5142 .L35 2018 (Mapit)
Available at Stacks
Formats
Format | |
---|---|
BibTeX | |
MARCXML | |
TextMARC | |
MARC | |
DublinCore | |
EndNote | |
NLM | |
RefWorks | |
RIS |
Items
Details
Title
Complex equality and the Court of Justice of the European Union : reconciling diversity and harmonisation / by Richard Lang ; with foreword by Mark Bell.
Added Author
Imprint
Leiden, The Netherlands : Brill Nijoff, [2018]
Description
xiv, 376 pages ; 25 cm.
Series
Nijhoff studies in EU law ; v. 14.
Formatted Contents Note
Michael Walzer and complex equality
The principle of equal treatment of persons irrespective of gender
The 'Article 19' grounds : racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age, and sexual orientation
Nationality discrimination
Semi-suspect and non-suspect grounds
Reflections
Presenting a theory of mediated complexity
Evaluation.
The principle of equal treatment of persons irrespective of gender
The 'Article 19' grounds : racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age, and sexual orientation
Nationality discrimination
Semi-suspect and non-suspect grounds
Reflections
Presenting a theory of mediated complexity
Evaluation.
Summary
The equality jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union has long drawn criticism for its almost total reliance on Aristotle's doctrine that likes should be treated like, and unlikes unlike. As has often been shown, this is a blunt tool, entrenching assumptions and promoting difference-blindness: the symptoms of simplicity. In this book, Richard Lang proposes that the EU's judges complement the Aristotelian test with a new one based on Michael Walzer's theory of Complex Equality, and illustrates how analysing allegedly discriminatory acts, not in terms of comparisons of the actors involved, but rather in terms of distributions and meanings of goods, would enable them to reach decisions with new dexterity and to resolve conflicts without sacrificing diversity.
Note
The equality jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union has long drawn criticism for its almost total reliance on Aristotle's doctrine that likes should be treated like, and unlikes unlike. As has often been shown, this is a blunt tool, entrenching assumptions and promoting difference-blindness: the symptoms of simplicity. In this book, Richard Lang proposes that the EU's judges complement the Aristotelian test with a new one based on Michael Walzer's theory of Complex Equality, and illustrates how analysing allegedly discriminatory acts, not in terms of comparisons of the actors involved, but rather in terms of distributions and meanings of goods, would enable them to reach decisions with new dexterity and to resolve conflicts without sacrificing diversity.
Bibliography, etc. Note
Includes bibliographical references (pages 352-372) and index.
Call Number
KJE5142 .L35 2018
Language
English
ISBN
9789004299993 hardcover
9004299998 hardcover
9004299998 hardcover
Record Appears in