In the Supreme Court of the United States, Roselva Chaidez, petitioner, v. United States of America, respondent :: on writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit : brief of amici curiae National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers [and 21 others] in support of petitioner /: Craig Louis Siegel [and 8 others].

Siegel, Craig Louis,; Chaidez, Roselva,; United States,; National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (U.S.),; United States.

In the Supreme Court of the United States, Roselva Chaidez, petitioner, v. United States of America, respondent : on writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit : brief of amici curiae National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers [and 21 others] in support of petitioner / Craig Louis Siegel [and 8 others].

Siegel, Craig Louis, author.; Chaidez, Roselva, petitioner.; United States, respondent.; National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (U.S.), amicus curiae.; United States. Court of Appeals (7th Circuit); United States. Supreme Court.

2012

Available Online

Formats

Format
BibTeX
MARCXML
TextMARC
MARC
DublinCore
EndNote
NLM
RefWorks
RIS

Add to Basket

Items

Details

Author

Siegel, Craig Louis, author.

Title

In the Supreme Court of the United States, Roselva Chaidez, petitioner, v. United States of America, respondent : on writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit : brief of amici curiae National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers [and 21 others] in support of petitioner / Craig Louis Siegel [and 8 others].

Added Author

Chaidez, Roselva, petitioner.

Added Corporate Author

United States, respondent.
National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (U.S.), amicus curiae.
United States. Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
United States. Supreme Court.

Variant Title

HeinOnline index title: Brief for the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, National Legal Aid & Defender Association, Law Office of the Cook County Public Defender, Public Defender's Office for the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida, Los Angeles County Public Defender's Office, the Kentucky Department of Public Advocacy, Immigration Impact Unit of the Massachusetts Committee for Public Counsel Services, the New York State Defenders Association, Legal Aid Society, the Oregon Criminal Defense Lawyers Association, the New Mexico Criminal Defense Lawyers Association, the Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers of New Jersey, Hall County Public Defender, Lancaster County Public Defender's Office, Texas Fair Defense Project, Washington Defender Association, the Office of the Defender General of Vermont, the Neighborhood Defender Service of Harlem, Florence Immigrant and Refugee Rights Project, Immigrant Defense Project, Immigrant Legal Resource Center, and the National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild in support of petitioner

Imprint

[United States] : Cockle Law Brief Printing Co., [2012]

Distributed

[Getzville, New York] : William S. Hein & Company, [2017?]

Description

1 online resource (x, 30, 13A, 44B pages).

Series

Immigration law & policy in the U.S.
New York legal research library.

Summary

The question presented is whether the Supreme Court's decision in Padilla v. Kentucky, which allows a defendant to contest his/her conviction based on an attorney's failure to advise of the immigration consequences (e.g., deportation) of a guilty plea, applies to convictions finalized prior to that decision.

Note

"No. 11-820."
"July 2012"--page 30.

Bibliography, etc. Note

"Table of authorities": pages iii-x.

Source of Description

Description based on PDF title page, viewed May 31, 2017.

Location

www

Linked Resources

Access provided by Berkeley Law Library, HeinOnline Immigration Law & Policy in the U.S.

Alternate Title

HeinOnline.