Behavioral law and economics / edited by Jeffrey J. Rachlinski.
2009
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Items
Details
Title
Behavioral law and economics / edited by Jeffrey J. Rachlinski.
Added Author
Added Corporate Author
Imprint
Cheltenham, UK ; Northampton, MA : Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2009.
Description
1 online resource (3 volumes) ; cm.
Series
Economic approaches to law ; 23.
Formatted Contents Note
Recommended readings (Machine generated): Christine Jolls, Cass R. Sunstein and Richard Thaler (1998), 'A Behavioral Approach to Law and Economics', Stanford Law Review, 50 (5), May, 1471-550
Robert A. Hillman (2000), 'The Limits of Behavioral Decision Theory in Legal Analysis: The Case of Liquidated Damages', Cornell Law Review, 85, 717-38
Jeffrey J. Rachlinski (2000), 'The "New" Law and Psychology: A Reply to Critics, Skeptics, and Cautious Supporters', Cornell Law Review, 85, (3) 739-66
Lee Ross and Andrew Ward (1995), 'Psychological Barriers to Dispute Resolution', in Mark P. Zanna (ed) (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 27, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 255-304
Linda Babcock and George Loewenstein (1997), 'Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases', Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11 (1), Winter, 109-26
Chris Guthrie (2000), 'Framing Frivolous Litigation: A Psychological Theory', University of Chicago Law Review, 67 (1), Winter, 163-216
Jeffrey J. Rachlinski (1998), 'A Positive Psychological Theory of Judging in Hindsight', University of Chicago Law Review, 65 (2), Spring, 571-625
John D. Hanson and Douglas A. Kysar (1999), excerpt from 'Taking Behavioralism Seriously: The Problem of Market Manipulation', New York University Law Review, 74, 693-749
Jonathan J. Koehler and Andrew D. Gershoff (2003), 'Betrayal Aversion: When Agents of Protection Become Agents of Harm', Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90, 244-61
Melvin Aron Eisenberg (1995), 'The Limits of Cognition and the Limits of Contract', Stanford Law Review, 47 (2), January, 211-59
Robert A. Hillman and Jeffrey J. Rachlinski (2002), 'Standard- Form Contracting in the Electronic Age', New York University Law Review, 77, 429-95
Oren Bar-Gill (2008), ' The Behavioral Economics of Consumer Contracts', Minnesota Law Review, 92 (3), February, 749-801
Richard A. Epstein (2008), 'The Neoclassical Economics of Consumer Contracts', Minnesota Law Review, 92 (3), February, 803-835
Russell Korobkin (2000), 'Behavioral Economics, Contract Formation, and Contract Law', in Cass R. Sunstein (ed) (ed.), Behavioral Law and Economics, Chapter 4, Cambridge University Press, 116-43
Ward Farnsworth (1999), 'Do Parties to Nuisance Cases Bargain after Judgment? A Glimpse Inside the Cathedral', University of Chicago Law Review, 66 (2), Spring, 373-436
Jeffrey J. Rachlinski and Forest Jourden (1998), 'Remedies and the Psychology of Ownership', Vanderbilt Law Review, 51 (6), November, 1541-82
Linda Hamilton Krieger (1995), 'The Content of Our Categories: A Cognitive Bias Approach to Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity', Stanford Law Review, 47 (6), July, 1161-248
Anthony G. Greenwald and Linda Hamilton Krieger (2006), 'Implicit Bias: Scientific Foundations', California Law Review, 94 (4), 945-67
Jerry Kang and Mahzarin R. Banaji (2006), 'Fair Measures: A Behavioral Realist Revision of "Affirmative Action"', California Law Review, 94, 1063-118.
Donald C. Langevoort (2002), 'Taming the Animal Spirits of the Stock Markets: A Behavioral Approach to Securities Regulation', Northwestern University Law Review, 97 (1), 135-88
Donald C. Langevoort (1997), 'Organized Illusions: A Behavioral Theory of Why Corporations Mislead Stock Market Investors (and Cause Other Social Harms)', University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 146 (1), November, 101-72
Neal Kumar Katyal (2003), 'Conspiracy Theory', Yale Law Journal, 112 (6), April, 1307-98
Paul H. Robinson and John M. Darley (2007), 'Intuitions of Justice: Implications for Criminal Law and Justice Policy', Southern California Law Review, 81 (1), November, 1-67
Dan M. Kahan (2003), 'The Logic of Reciprocity: Trust, Collective Action, and Law', Michigan Law Review, 102 (1), October, 71-103
Chris Guthrie, Jeffrey J. Rachlinski and Andrew J. Wistrich (2001), 'Inside the Judicial Mind', Cornell Law Review, 86 (4), May, 777-830
Dan Simon (2004), 'A Third View of the Black Box: Cognitive Coherence in Legal Decision Making', University of Chicago Law Review, 71 (2), Spring, 511-86
Cass R. Sunstein, Daniel Kahneman, David Schkade and Ilana Ritov (2002), 'Predictably Incoherent Judgments', Stanford Law Review, 54 (6), June, 1153-215
Dan M. Kahan (2007), 'The Cognitively Illiberal State', Stanford Law Review, 60 (1), October, 115-54
Cass R. Sunstein (2005), 'Moral Heuristics', Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28 (4), August, 531-42, references
Jeffrey J. Rachlinski and Cynthia R. Farina (2002), 'Cognitive Psychology and Optimal Government Design', Cornell Law Review, 87, January, 549-615
Jeffrey J. Rachlinski (2000), 'The Psychology of Global Climate Change', University of Illinois Law Review, 2000 (1), 299-319
Cass R. Sunstein and Richard H. Thaler (2003), 'Libertarian Paternalism Is Not an Oxymoron', University of Chicago Law Review, 70 (4), 1159-202
Colin Camerer, Samuel Issacharoff, George Loewenstein, Ted O'Donoghue and Matthew Rabin (2003), 'Regulation for Conservatives: Behavioral Economics and the Case for "Asymmetric Paternalism"', University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 151 (3), 1211-54
Christine Jolls and Cass R. Sunstein (2006), 'Debiasing through Law', Journal of Legal Studies, 35 (1), 199-241
Robert H. Frank and Cass R. Sunstein (2001), 'Cost-Benefit Analysis and Relative Position', University of Chicago Law Review, 68 (2), Spring, 323-74.
Robert A. Hillman (2000), 'The Limits of Behavioral Decision Theory in Legal Analysis: The Case of Liquidated Damages', Cornell Law Review, 85, 717-38
Jeffrey J. Rachlinski (2000), 'The "New" Law and Psychology: A Reply to Critics, Skeptics, and Cautious Supporters', Cornell Law Review, 85, (3) 739-66
Lee Ross and Andrew Ward (1995), 'Psychological Barriers to Dispute Resolution', in Mark P. Zanna (ed) (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 27, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 255-304
Linda Babcock and George Loewenstein (1997), 'Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases', Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11 (1), Winter, 109-26
Chris Guthrie (2000), 'Framing Frivolous Litigation: A Psychological Theory', University of Chicago Law Review, 67 (1), Winter, 163-216
Jeffrey J. Rachlinski (1998), 'A Positive Psychological Theory of Judging in Hindsight', University of Chicago Law Review, 65 (2), Spring, 571-625
John D. Hanson and Douglas A. Kysar (1999), excerpt from 'Taking Behavioralism Seriously: The Problem of Market Manipulation', New York University Law Review, 74, 693-749
Jonathan J. Koehler and Andrew D. Gershoff (2003), 'Betrayal Aversion: When Agents of Protection Become Agents of Harm', Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90, 244-61
Melvin Aron Eisenberg (1995), 'The Limits of Cognition and the Limits of Contract', Stanford Law Review, 47 (2), January, 211-59
Robert A. Hillman and Jeffrey J. Rachlinski (2002), 'Standard- Form Contracting in the Electronic Age', New York University Law Review, 77, 429-95
Oren Bar-Gill (2008), ' The Behavioral Economics of Consumer Contracts', Minnesota Law Review, 92 (3), February, 749-801
Richard A. Epstein (2008), 'The Neoclassical Economics of Consumer Contracts', Minnesota Law Review, 92 (3), February, 803-835
Russell Korobkin (2000), 'Behavioral Economics, Contract Formation, and Contract Law', in Cass R. Sunstein (ed) (ed.), Behavioral Law and Economics, Chapter 4, Cambridge University Press, 116-43
Ward Farnsworth (1999), 'Do Parties to Nuisance Cases Bargain after Judgment? A Glimpse Inside the Cathedral', University of Chicago Law Review, 66 (2), Spring, 373-436
Jeffrey J. Rachlinski and Forest Jourden (1998), 'Remedies and the Psychology of Ownership', Vanderbilt Law Review, 51 (6), November, 1541-82
Linda Hamilton Krieger (1995), 'The Content of Our Categories: A Cognitive Bias Approach to Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity', Stanford Law Review, 47 (6), July, 1161-248
Anthony G. Greenwald and Linda Hamilton Krieger (2006), 'Implicit Bias: Scientific Foundations', California Law Review, 94 (4), 945-67
Jerry Kang and Mahzarin R. Banaji (2006), 'Fair Measures: A Behavioral Realist Revision of "Affirmative Action"', California Law Review, 94, 1063-118.
Donald C. Langevoort (2002), 'Taming the Animal Spirits of the Stock Markets: A Behavioral Approach to Securities Regulation', Northwestern University Law Review, 97 (1), 135-88
Donald C. Langevoort (1997), 'Organized Illusions: A Behavioral Theory of Why Corporations Mislead Stock Market Investors (and Cause Other Social Harms)', University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 146 (1), November, 101-72
Neal Kumar Katyal (2003), 'Conspiracy Theory', Yale Law Journal, 112 (6), April, 1307-98
Paul H. Robinson and John M. Darley (2007), 'Intuitions of Justice: Implications for Criminal Law and Justice Policy', Southern California Law Review, 81 (1), November, 1-67
Dan M. Kahan (2003), 'The Logic of Reciprocity: Trust, Collective Action, and Law', Michigan Law Review, 102 (1), October, 71-103
Chris Guthrie, Jeffrey J. Rachlinski and Andrew J. Wistrich (2001), 'Inside the Judicial Mind', Cornell Law Review, 86 (4), May, 777-830
Dan Simon (2004), 'A Third View of the Black Box: Cognitive Coherence in Legal Decision Making', University of Chicago Law Review, 71 (2), Spring, 511-86
Cass R. Sunstein, Daniel Kahneman, David Schkade and Ilana Ritov (2002), 'Predictably Incoherent Judgments', Stanford Law Review, 54 (6), June, 1153-215
Dan M. Kahan (2007), 'The Cognitively Illiberal State', Stanford Law Review, 60 (1), October, 115-54
Cass R. Sunstein (2005), 'Moral Heuristics', Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28 (4), August, 531-42, references
Jeffrey J. Rachlinski and Cynthia R. Farina (2002), 'Cognitive Psychology and Optimal Government Design', Cornell Law Review, 87, January, 549-615
Jeffrey J. Rachlinski (2000), 'The Psychology of Global Climate Change', University of Illinois Law Review, 2000 (1), 299-319
Cass R. Sunstein and Richard H. Thaler (2003), 'Libertarian Paternalism Is Not an Oxymoron', University of Chicago Law Review, 70 (4), 1159-202
Colin Camerer, Samuel Issacharoff, George Loewenstein, Ted O'Donoghue and Matthew Rabin (2003), 'Regulation for Conservatives: Behavioral Economics and the Case for "Asymmetric Paternalism"', University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 151 (3), 1211-54
Christine Jolls and Cass R. Sunstein (2006), 'Debiasing through Law', Journal of Legal Studies, 35 (1), 199-241
Robert H. Frank and Cass R. Sunstein (2001), 'Cost-Benefit Analysis and Relative Position', University of Chicago Law Review, 68 (2), Spring, 323-74.
Summary
In this comprehensive collection Jeffrey Rachlinski brings together the most important previously published articles in the emerging field of behavioral law and economics. His selection represents a novel blending of economics, psychology and law. The three volumes cover such constituent topics as suit and settlement, torts, civil rights and discrimination, criminal law, trial processes and paternalism and regulation. The editor has written an original introduction which provides insightful coverage of this new and exciting area of study.
Note
The recommended readings are available in the print version, or may be available via the link to your library's holdings.
Bibliography, etc. Note
Includes bibliographical references.
Location
WWW
Linked Resources
Alternate Title
Elgaronline.
Language
English
ISBN
9781785362774 e-book
Record Appears in